Durandal vs Polymer

Struggling to choose between Durandal and Polymer? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Durandal is a Development solution with tags like singlepage, modular, mvvm.

It boasts features such as Modular architecture, MVVM pattern support, SPA routing, Async module loading, View composition, View models, Data binding with KnockoutJS and pros including Lightweight and fast, Good documentation, Active community support, Integrates well with other JS libraries, Promotes code reusability.

On the other hand, Polymer is a Development product tagged with web-components, javascript, library, frontend.

Its standout features include Component-based architecture, Interoperability with other libraries, Declarative programming model, Data binding support, Template stamping, Shadow DOM encapsulation, Cross-browser support, and it shines with pros like Good documentation, Large community support, Performance optimizations, Simplifies web component development, Encapsulation promotes reusability, Lightweight library.

Feature	Durandal	Polymer
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Durandal

Description: Durandal is a JavaScript application framework that helps developers build single-page web apps. It uses some popular JavaScript libraries like jQuery and Knockout.js and provides structure, modularity, and patterns to build complex web apps.

Polymer

Description: Polymer is an open-source JavaScript library for building web applications using Web Components. It allows developers to create custom, reusable HTML elements with encapsulated functionality and styles.

Key Features Comparison

Durandal Features

• Modular architecture
• MVVM pattern support
• SPA routing
• Async module loading
• View composition
• View models
• Data binding with KnockoutJS

Polymer Features

• Component-based architecture
• Interoperability with other libraries
• Declarative programming model
• Data binding support
• Template stamping
• Shadow DOM encapsulation
• Cross-browser support

Pros & Cons Analysis

Durandal

Pros

• Lightweight and fast
• Good documentation
• Active community support
• Integrates well with other JS libraries
• Promotes code reusability

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Limited native mobile support
• Not beginner friendly
• Lacks some advanced features of other frameworks

Polymer

Pros

• Good documentation
• Large community support
• Performance optimizations
• Simplifies web component development
• Encapsulation promotes reusability
• Lightweight library

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Limited IE11 support
• Upgrade issues between major versions
• Not ideal for very large applications
• Some browser inconsistencies

Pricing Comparison

Durandal

• Open Source

Polymer

• Open Source