Earthly vs BuildHive

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

Earthly icon
Earthly
BuildHive icon
BuildHive

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between Earthly and BuildHive? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Earthly is a Development solution with tags like build, automation, monorepo, caching, reproducible.

It boasts features such as Declarative build definitions, Automatic caching and parallelization, Built specifically for monorepos, Integration with Docker containers, Support for incremental builds, Cross-platform support and pros including Fast and reproducible builds, Simplifies build configuration, Improves developer productivity, Makes dependency management easier, Good for large, complex projects.

On the other hand, BuildHive is a Development product tagged with automation, testing, deployment, agile.

Its standout features include Automated build, test and deployment pipelines, Integration with GitHub, BitBucket, GitLab, Parallel testing, Customizable workflows, REST API, Notifications and reporting, Self-hosted or cloud options, and it shines with pros like Automates repetitive tasks to enable faster release cycles, Easy to set up and configure pipelines, Integrates with popular source control tools, Scalable to handle large, complex projects, Open source and self-hosted options available.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare Earthly and BuildHive?

When evaluating Earthly versus BuildHive, both solutions serve different needs within the development ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

Earthly and BuildHive have established themselves in the development market. Key areas include build, automation, monorepo.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between Earthly and BuildHive significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include build, automation, monorepo, caching.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include build, automation and automation, testing.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between Earthly and BuildHive. You might also explore build, automation, monorepo for alternative approaches.

Feature Earthly BuildHive
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Development Development
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

Earthly
Earthly

Description: Earthly is an open-source build automation tool for monorepo-style codebases. It allows developers to define builds and dependencies in a declarative way, then automatically parallelizes and caches builds for fast, reproducible development.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

BuildHive
BuildHive

Description: BuildHive is a continuous integration and delivery platform designed for agile development teams. It automates building, testing and deployment of software to help teams release quality software faster.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

Earthly
Earthly Features
  • Declarative build definitions
  • Automatic caching and parallelization
  • Built specifically for monorepos
  • Integration with Docker containers
  • Support for incremental builds
  • Cross-platform support
BuildHive
BuildHive Features
  • Automated build, test and deployment pipelines
  • Integration with GitHub, BitBucket, GitLab
  • Parallel testing
  • Customizable workflows
  • REST API
  • Notifications and reporting
  • Self-hosted or cloud options

Pros & Cons Analysis

Earthly
Earthly
Pros
  • Fast and reproducible builds
  • Simplifies build configuration
  • Improves developer productivity
  • Makes dependency management easier
  • Good for large, complex projects
Cons
  • Limited adoption so far
  • Steep learning curve
  • Less flexibility than general build tools
  • Only supports Docker containers
  • Mainly aimed at monorepos
BuildHive
BuildHive
Pros
  • Automates repetitive tasks to enable faster release cycles
  • Easy to set up and configure pipelines
  • Integrates with popular source control tools
  • Scalable to handle large, complex projects
  • Open source and self-hosted options available
Cons
  • Initial setup requires some learning curve
  • Lacks advanced features of enterprise platforms like Jenkins
  • Self-hosted version requires maintaining your own servers
  • UI is not as polished as some competitors

Pricing Comparison

Earthly
Earthly
  • Open Source
BuildHive
BuildHive
  • Open Source
  • Freemium
  • Subscription-Based

Get More Information

Earthly
Earthly
Earthly
Learn More About Earthly
BuildHive
BuildHive
BuildHive
Learn More About BuildHive

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs

Browse More Software
Back to Homepage
Company
Explore
Resources

Find your fit.

© 2025 Sugggest.com. All Rights Reserved.
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Legal