Earthly vs Parabuild

Struggling to choose between Earthly and Parabuild? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Earthly is a Development solution with tags like build, automation, monorepo, caching, reproducible.

It boasts features such as Declarative build definitions, Automatic caching and parallelization, Built specifically for monorepos, Integration with Docker containers, Support for incremental builds, Cross-platform support and pros including Fast and reproducible builds, Simplifies build configuration, Improves developer productivity, Makes dependency management easier, Good for large, complex projects.

On the other hand, Parabuild is a Development product tagged with build-automation, test-automation, release-management, version-control-integration.

Its standout features include Automated build and test execution, Continuous integration and continuous deployment, Integration with version control systems (SVN, Git, Perforce, etc.), Customizable build and test workflows, Distributed build execution across multiple servers, Reporting and notifications, Release management and deployment automation, and it shines with pros like Streamlines the build and deployment process, Provides fast feedback to developers, Supports various version control systems and programming languages, Customizable to fit different development workflows, Distributed build execution for scalability.

Feature	Earthly	Parabuild
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Earthly

Description: Earthly is an open-source build automation tool for monorepo-style codebases. It allows developers to define builds and dependencies in a declarative way, then automatically parallelizes and caches builds for fast, reproducible development.

Parabuild

Description: Parabuild is an automated build tool and continuous integration server. It automatically builds and tests software projects whenever changes are made, providing fast feedback to developers. Key features include build automation, test automation, release management, and integration with version control systems.

Key Features Comparison

Earthly Features

• Declarative build definitions
• Automatic caching and parallelization
• Built specifically for monorepos
• Integration with Docker containers
• Support for incremental builds
• Cross-platform support

Parabuild Features

• Automated build and test execution
• Continuous integration and continuous deployment
• Integration with version control systems (SVN, Git, Perforce, etc.)
• Customizable build and test workflows
• Distributed build execution across multiple servers
• Reporting and notifications
• Release management and deployment automation

Pros & Cons Analysis

Earthly

Pros

• Fast and reproducible builds
• Simplifies build configuration
• Improves developer productivity
• Makes dependency management easier
• Good for large, complex projects

Cons

• Limited adoption so far
• Steep learning curve
• Less flexibility than general build tools
• Only supports Docker containers
• Mainly aimed at monorepos

Parabuild

Pros

• Streamlines the build and deployment process
• Provides fast feedback to developers
• Supports various version control systems and programming languages
• Customizable to fit different development workflows
• Distributed build execution for scalability

Cons

• Can be complex to set up and configure for larger projects
• Limited community support and documentation compared to some other CI/CD tools
• May require additional infrastructure and maintenance overhead

Pricing Comparison

Earthly

• Open Source

Parabuild

• Subscription-Based