ember.js vs Polymer

Struggling to choose between ember.js and Polymer? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

ember.js is a Development solution with tags like frontend, spa, mvc.

It boasts features such as Component-based architecture, Two-way data binding, Router for handling routes, Templating engine, Addons ecosystem and pros including Organized structure, Large community, Good documentation, Easy to learn.

On the other hand, Polymer is a Development product tagged with web-components, javascript, library, frontend.

Its standout features include Component-based architecture, Interoperability with other libraries, Declarative programming model, Data binding support, Template stamping, Shadow DOM encapsulation, Cross-browser support, and it shines with pros like Good documentation, Large community support, Performance optimizations, Simplifies web component development, Encapsulation promotes reusability, Lightweight library.

Feature	ember.js	Polymer
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

ember.js

Description: Ember.js is a popular open-source JavaScript web framework that emphasizes conventions over configuration, modeled after Ruby on Rails. It uses common idioms and established patterns to help developers build scalable single-page web applications.

Polymer

Description: Polymer is an open-source JavaScript library for building web applications using Web Components. It allows developers to create custom, reusable HTML elements with encapsulated functionality and styles.

Key Features Comparison

ember.js Features

• Component-based architecture
• Two-way data binding
• Router for handling routes
• Templating engine
• Addons ecosystem

Polymer Features

• Component-based architecture
• Interoperability with other libraries
• Declarative programming model
• Data binding support
• Template stamping
• Shadow DOM encapsulation
• Cross-browser support

Pros & Cons Analysis

ember.js

Pros

• Organized structure
• Large community
• Good documentation
• Easy to learn

Cons

• Steep learning curve initially
• Complex configurations
• Not beginner friendly

Polymer

Pros

• Good documentation
• Large community support
• Performance optimizations
• Simplifies web component development
• Encapsulation promotes reusability
• Lightweight library

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Limited IE11 support
• Upgrade issues between major versions
• Not ideal for very large applications
• Some browser inconsistencies

Pricing Comparison

ember.js

• Open Source

Polymer

• Open Source