Endtest vs BrowserStack

Struggling to choose between Endtest and BrowserStack? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Endtest is a Development solution with tags like load-testing, performance-testing, web-application-testing.

It boasts features such as Record and replay scripts to simulate user interactions, Support for multiple protocols including HTTP, HTTPS, SOAP, REST, FTP, and more, Distributed load testing using multiple machines, Detailed performance metrics and customizable reports, Command line interface and integration with CI/CD pipelines, Open source and self-hosted option available and pros including Free and open source, Easy to use interface, Support for advanced scripting and extensibility, Scales to thousands of concurrent users, Detailed and customizable analytics.

On the other hand, BrowserStack is a Development product tagged with crossbrowser, testing, automation.

Its standout features include Cross-browser testing, Mobile app testing, Responsive testing, Debugging and issue tracking, Automated screenshots, Geolocation testing, Network traffic throttling, Console error logging, Visual testing, and it shines with pros like Supports a wide range of browsers and devices, Easy to set up and use, Good for responsive and mobile testing, Integrates with popular CI/CD tools, Provides debugging and issue tracking tools, Offers automated screenshot capturing.

Feature	Endtest	BrowserStack
Overall Score	N/A	1
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Endtest

Description: Endtest is an open-source load and performance testing tool for web applications. It allows users to simulate large numbers of virtual users accessing a web application to test overall system performance and capacity.

BrowserStack

Description: BrowserStack is a cross-browser testing tool that allows you to test your website or app across various browsers and devices. It provides an online testing environment and a large range of browsers and operating systems.

Key Features Comparison

Endtest Features

• Record and replay scripts to simulate user interactions
• Support for multiple protocols including HTTP, HTTPS, SOAP, REST, FTP, and more
• Distributed load testing using multiple machines
• Detailed performance metrics and customizable reports
• Command line interface and integration with CI/CD pipelines
• Open source and self-hosted option available

BrowserStack Features

• Cross-browser testing
• Mobile app testing
• Responsive testing
• Debugging and issue tracking
• Automated screenshots
• Geolocation testing
• Network traffic throttling
• Console error logging
• Visual testing

Pros & Cons Analysis

Endtest

Pros

• Free and open source
• Easy to use interface
• Support for advanced scripting and extensibility
• Scales to thousands of concurrent users
• Detailed and customizable analytics

Cons

• Limited to web application testing
• Steep learning curve for advanced scripting
• Not as feature rich as commercial solutions

BrowserStack

Pros

• Supports a wide range of browsers and devices
• Easy to set up and use
• Good for responsive and mobile testing
• Integrates with popular CI/CD tools
• Provides debugging and issue tracking tools
• Offers automated screenshot capturing

Cons

• Can be expensive for large teams
• Limited testing time on lower plans
• No ad hoc on-demand testing
• Not ideal for end-to-end testing
• Lacks advanced scripting capabilities

Pricing Comparison

Endtest

• Open Source
• Free
• Freemium

BrowserStack

• Subscription-Based