Filestash vs Artefactual AtoM

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

Filestash icon
Filestash
Artefactual AtoM icon
Artefactual AtoM

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between Filestash and Artefactual AtoM? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Filestash is a File Management solution with tags like selfhosted, open-source, file-upload, file-download, file-preview, file-rename, file-edit, file-organize.

It boasts features such as Web-based file manager interface, Drag and drop file uploads, File sharing and links, File previews (documents, images, video, audio), Basic file editing, Folder and user management, Plugin support, Works across platforms and pros including Easy to use web interface, Self-hosted and open source, Good performance, Lots of integrations, Active development.

On the other hand, Artefactual AtoM is a Education & Reference product tagged with archival-description, digital-preservation, open-source.

Its standout features include Web-based accessions management, Multi-level description standards support, Flexible metadata standards, Multilingual interface, Access controls and user permissions, Linked data support, Customizable workflows, Reporting and statistics, and it shines with pros like Open source and free, User-friendly interface, Standards compliant, Extensive customization options, Active development community.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare Filestash and Artefactual AtoM?

When evaluating Filestash versus Artefactual AtoM, both solutions serve different needs within the file management ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

Filestash and Artefactual AtoM have established themselves in the file management market. Key areas include selfhosted, open-source, file-upload.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between Filestash and Artefactual AtoM significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include selfhosted, open-source, file-upload, file-download.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include selfhosted, open-source and archival-description, digital-preservation.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between Filestash and Artefactual AtoM. You might also explore selfhosted, open-source, file-upload for alternative approaches.

Feature Filestash Artefactual AtoM
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category File Management Education & Reference
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

Filestash
Filestash

Description: Filestash is a web file manager that allows you to manage your files and folders through a web interface. It is self-hosted, open source software that provides an easy way to upload, download, preview, rename, edit, and organize files without having to use FTP.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

Artefactual AtoM
Artefactual AtoM

Description: Artefactual AtoM is open source software for managing archival descriptions of physical and digital objects. It helps archivists, librarians, and researchers to publish and share archival descriptions and make collections accessible online.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

Filestash
Filestash Features
  • Web-based file manager interface
  • Drag and drop file uploads
  • File sharing and links
  • File previews (documents, images, video, audio)
  • Basic file editing
  • Folder and user management
  • Plugin support
  • Works across platforms
Artefactual AtoM
Artefactual AtoM Features
  • Web-based accessions management
  • Multi-level description standards support
  • Flexible metadata standards
  • Multilingual interface
  • Access controls and user permissions
  • Linked data support
  • Customizable workflows
  • Reporting and statistics

Pros & Cons Analysis

Filestash
Filestash
Pros
  • Easy to use web interface
  • Self-hosted and open source
  • Good performance
  • Lots of integrations
  • Active development
Cons
  • Setup can be tricky
  • Lacks some advanced features
  • Mobile app needs work
  • Documentation could be better
Artefactual AtoM
Artefactual AtoM
Pros
  • Open source and free
  • User-friendly interface
  • Standards compliant
  • Extensive customization options
  • Active development community
Cons
  • Can be complex for smaller institutions
  • Requires some technical expertise to install/configure
  • Limited native digitization tools
  • Less out-of-box functionality than some commercial products

Pricing Comparison

Filestash
Filestash
  • Open Source
  • Self-Hosted
Artefactual AtoM
Artefactual AtoM
  • Open Source

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs