Fluid Browser vs Aurora floating browser

Struggling to choose between Fluid Browser and Aurora floating browser? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Fluid Browser is a Web Browsers solution with tags like chromium, opensource, keyboard-shortcuts, tab-management, ad-blocking.

It boasts features such as Built on Chromium engine, Extensive keyboard shortcuts, Tab management tools like pinning and tiling, Built-in ad blocking and pros including Very customizable, Lightweight and fast, Open source codebase, Supports Chrome extensions.

On the other hand, Aurora floating browser is a Web Browsers product tagged with lightweight, floating, multitasking, productivity.

Its standout features include Floating browser windows, Tabbed browsing, Private browsing mode, Bookmark management, Download manager, Customizable themes, Extensions support, and it shines with pros like Lightweight and fast, Increases multitasking productivity, Windows can float above other apps, Supports multiple tabs, Has private browsing mode.

Feature	Fluid Browser	Aurora floating browser
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Web Browsers	Web Browsers

Product Overview

Fluid Browser

Description: Fluid Browser is an open-source web browser built on the Chromium engine. It is designed for macOS users who want more customization and productivity options than Safari or Chrome provide. Key features include extensive keyboard shortcuts, tab management tools like pinning and tiling, and built-in ad blocking.

Aurora floating browser

Description: Aurora floating browser is a lightweight web browser that allows you to have browser windows float above other open applications. It is designed to increase multitasking productivity.

Key Features Comparison

Fluid Browser Features

• Built on Chromium engine
• Extensive keyboard shortcuts
• Tab management tools like pinning and tiling
• Built-in ad blocking

Aurora floating browser Features

• Floating browser windows
• Tabbed browsing
• Private browsing mode
• Bookmark management
• Download manager
• Customizable themes
• Extensions support

Pros & Cons Analysis

Fluid Browser

Pros

• Very customizable
• Lightweight and fast
• Open source codebase
• Supports Chrome extensions

Cons

• Limited adoption so far
• Fewer plugins than major browsers
• Less frequent updates than Chrome

Aurora floating browser

Pros

• Lightweight and fast
• Increases multitasking productivity
• Windows can float above other apps
• Supports multiple tabs
• Has private browsing mode

Cons

• Limited customization options
• No sync across devices
• Fewer extensions than major browsers

Pricing Comparison

Fluid Browser

• Open Source

Aurora floating browser

• Freemium