flwm vs i3

Struggling to choose between flwm and i3? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

flwm is a Os & Utilities solution with tags like lightweight, customizable, keybindings, multimonitor, compositing, extensible.

It boasts features such as Lightweight and minimalist design, Fully customizable keybindings, Multi-monitor support, Compositing effects, Tabbed windows, Virtual desktops and pros including Very fast and responsive, Low memory usage, Extremely customizable, Clean and intuitive interface.

On the other hand, i3 is a Os & Utilities product tagged with tiling, keyboarddriven, lightweight, configurable, unixlike.

Its standout features include Tiling window manager, Tree-like window organization, Customizable keyboard shortcuts, Simple, lightweight and fast, Support for multiple workspaces, and it shines with pros like Very efficient use of screen space, Highly customizable, Light on system resources, Keyboard-driven workflow, Stable and mature codebase.

Feature	flwm	i3
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Os & Utilities	Os & Utilities

Product Overview

flwm

Description: flwm is a lightweight and customizable window manager for X. It features fully customizable keybindings, multi-monitor support, compositing effects, and more. flwm aims to be fast, lightweight, and extensible.

i3

Description: i3 is a tiling window manager for Linux and other Unix-like operating systems. It is designed to be simple, fast, and lightweight while still being customizable and flexible. i3 organizes application windows in a tree-like structure and allows efficient window switching and placement.

Key Features Comparison

flwm Features

• Lightweight and minimalist design
• Fully customizable keybindings
• Multi-monitor support
• Compositing effects
• Tabbed windows
• Virtual desktops

i3 Features

• Tiling window manager
• Tree-like window organization
• Customizable keyboard shortcuts
• Simple, lightweight and fast
• Support for multiple workspaces

Pros & Cons Analysis

flwm

Pros

• Very fast and responsive
• Low memory usage
• Extremely customizable
• Clean and intuitive interface

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Limited features out of the box
• Requires manual configuration
• Not beginner friendly

i3

Pros

• Very efficient use of screen space
• Highly customizable
• Light on system resources
• Keyboard-driven workflow
• Stable and mature codebase

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Manual configuration required
• Not designed for touchscreens
• Less flexibility in window arrangements
• Less integrated with desktop environment

Pricing Comparison

flwm

• Open Source

i3

• Open Source
• Free