Fortran vs C (programming language)

Struggling to choose between Fortran and C (programming language)? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Fortran is a Development solution with tags like numeric-computing, scientific-computing, compiled, imperative.

It boasts features such as Compiled language for high performance computing, Strong typing and data abstraction capabilities, Built-in mathematical and array processing functions, Backward compatibility to support legacy code, Interoperability with C and other languages and pros including Fast execution speed, Efficient code for numerical and scientific applications, Mature language with large user base and code libraries, Portable across platforms, Can call C functions directly.

On the other hand, C (programming language) is a Development product tagged with systems-programming, procedural-programming, c-standard-library, portability, efficiency.

Its standout features include Procedural programming model, Statically typed language, Low-level memory management, Portable across multiple platforms, Widely used for system programming, Supports structured programming constructs, Provides direct access to hardware resources, Supports modular programming through functions, and it shines with pros like Efficient and high-performance, Widely adopted and supported, Portable across different systems, Provides low-level control over hardware, Supports modular and structured programming, Large and active community with extensive resources.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Fortran

Fortran

Fortran is a general-purpose, compiled imperative programming language that is especially suited to numeric computation and scientific computing. Originally developed by IBM in the 1950s for scientific and engineering applications, Fortran came to dominate this area of programming early on and has been in continuous use for over half a century.

Categories:
numeric-computing scientific-computing compiled imperative

Fortran Features

  1. Compiled language for high performance computing
  2. Strong typing and data abstraction capabilities
  3. Built-in mathematical and array processing functions
  4. Backward compatibility to support legacy code
  5. Interoperability with C and other languages

Pricing

  • Open Source
  • Free Compilers

Pros

Fast execution speed

Efficient code for numerical and scientific applications

Mature language with large user base and code libraries

Portable across platforms

Can call C functions directly

Cons

Steep learning curve for new programmers

Verbose syntax compared to modern languages

Limited object-oriented capabilities

Lack of strings and dynamic data structures

Mostly used in legacy and scientific code, less demand in new development


C (programming language)

C (programming language)

C is a general-purpose, procedural programming language originally developed by Dennis Ritchie between 1969 and 1973 at Bell Labs. It is a very popular language, particularly for systems programming due to its flexibility, speed, and minimal runtime requirements.

Categories:
systems-programming procedural-programming c-standard-library portability efficiency

C (programming language) Features

  1. Procedural programming model
  2. Statically typed language
  3. Low-level memory management
  4. Portable across multiple platforms
  5. Widely used for system programming
  6. Supports structured programming constructs
  7. Provides direct access to hardware resources
  8. Supports modular programming through functions

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Efficient and high-performance

Widely adopted and supported

Portable across different systems

Provides low-level control over hardware

Supports modular and structured programming

Large and active community with extensive resources

Cons

Prone to memory-related errors

Requires more manual memory management

Steeper learning curve compared to some high-level languages

Limited built-in data structures and abstractions

Potential for security vulnerabilities if not used carefully