GitHub Actions vs Earthly

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

GitHub Actions icon
GitHub Actions
Earthly icon
Earthly

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between GitHub Actions and Earthly? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

GitHub Actions is a Development solution with tags like automation, cicd, testing, deployment, workflows.

It boasts features such as Workflow automation, Built-in CI/CD, Event-driven triggers, Reusable workflows, Flexible environment, GitHub integration, Third-party app integration, Security and access controls and pros including Seamless GitHub integration, Flexible and customizable workflows, Large ecosystem of actions and templates, Free for public repositories, Scales to any size project, Built-in secret management, Supports many languages and frameworks.

On the other hand, Earthly is a Development product tagged with build, automation, monorepo, caching, reproducible.

Its standout features include Declarative build definitions, Automatic caching and parallelization, Built specifically for monorepos, Integration with Docker containers, Support for incremental builds, Cross-platform support, and it shines with pros like Fast and reproducible builds, Simplifies build configuration, Improves developer productivity, Makes dependency management easier, Good for large, complex projects.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare GitHub Actions and Earthly?

When evaluating GitHub Actions versus Earthly, both solutions serve different needs within the development ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

GitHub Actions and Earthly have established themselves in the development market. Key areas include automation, cicd, testing.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between GitHub Actions and Earthly significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include automation, cicd, testing, deployment.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include automation, cicd and build, automation.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between GitHub Actions and Earthly. You might also explore automation, cicd, testing for alternative approaches.

Feature GitHub Actions Earthly
Overall Score 1 N/A
Primary Category Development Development
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

GitHub Actions
GitHub Actions

Description: GitHub Actions is a continuous integration and delivery (CI/CD) platform that allows you to automate your software development workflows. You can build, test, and deploy your code right from GitHub.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

Earthly
Earthly

Description: Earthly is an open-source build automation tool for monorepo-style codebases. It allows developers to define builds and dependencies in a declarative way, then automatically parallelizes and caches builds for fast, reproducible development.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

GitHub Actions
GitHub Actions Features
  • Workflow automation
  • Built-in CI/CD
  • Event-driven triggers
  • Reusable workflows
  • Flexible environment
  • GitHub integration
  • Third-party app integration
  • Security and access controls
Earthly
Earthly Features
  • Declarative build definitions
  • Automatic caching and parallelization
  • Built specifically for monorepos
  • Integration with Docker containers
  • Support for incremental builds
  • Cross-platform support

Pros & Cons Analysis

GitHub Actions
GitHub Actions
Pros
  • Seamless GitHub integration
  • Flexible and customizable workflows
  • Large ecosystem of actions and templates
  • Free for public repositories
  • Scales to any size project
  • Built-in secret management
  • Supports many languages and frameworks
Cons
  • Steep learning curve
  • Can get complex for larger projects
  • Limited debugging and troubleshooting
  • No official support offered
  • Limited to 2000 minutes per month for free tier
Earthly
Earthly
Pros
  • Fast and reproducible builds
  • Simplifies build configuration
  • Improves developer productivity
  • Makes dependency management easier
  • Good for large, complex projects
Cons
  • Limited adoption so far
  • Steep learning curve
  • Less flexibility than general build tools
  • Only supports Docker containers
  • Mainly aimed at monorepos

Pricing Comparison

GitHub Actions
GitHub Actions
  • Free
  • Open Source
Earthly
Earthly
  • Open Source

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs