gitstorage vs Bitbucket

Struggling to choose between gitstorage and Bitbucket? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

gitstorage is a Development solution with tags like git, selfhosted, repositories, workflows.

It boasts features such as Self-hosted Git repository hosting, Web UI for managing repositories, User management and access controls, Repository/branch permissions, Issue tracking, Wikis, Pull request reviews, CI/CD pipelines, Built-in Docker registry and pros including Full control and customization as self-hosted, No limits on private repositories, Can keep data on-premises, Lower cost than cloud for large # of repos, Integrates with existing infrastructure.

On the other hand, Bitbucket is a Development product tagged with git, mercurial, repository, version-control.

Its standout features include Git and Mercurial version control, Pull requests for code review, Issue tracking, Code search, Wikis for documentation, Integrations with Jira, Trello, etc, and it shines with pros like Unlimited private repositories for small teams, Great integration with other Atlassian products, Powerful branch permissions and workflows, Fast and reliable performance.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

gitstorage

gitstorage

gitstorage is a self-hosted alternative to GitHub and GitLab that allows you to host Git repositories on your own server. It has a simple, clean interface focused on efficient Git workflows.

Categories:
git selfhosted repositories workflows

Gitstorage Features

  1. Self-hosted Git repository hosting
  2. Web UI for managing repositories
  3. User management and access controls
  4. Repository/branch permissions
  5. Issue tracking
  6. Wikis
  7. Pull request reviews
  8. CI/CD pipelines
  9. Built-in Docker registry

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Full control and customization as self-hosted

No limits on private repositories

Can keep data on-premises

Lower cost than cloud for large # of repos

Integrates with existing infrastructure

Cons

Requires maintaining your own server(s)

Lacks some features of GitHub/GitLab

Steeper learning curve for setup/admin

Upgrades can require more effort


Bitbucket

Bitbucket

Bitbucket is a web-based version control repository hosting service owned by Atlassian that allows teams to collaborate on code. It provides tools to manage Git and Mercurial repositories, issue tracking, wikis, and more for teams of any size.

Categories:
git mercurial repository version-control

Bitbucket Features

  1. Git and Mercurial version control
  2. Pull requests for code review
  3. Issue tracking
  4. Code search
  5. Wikis for documentation
  6. Integrations with Jira, Trello, etc

Pricing

  • Free
  • Standard ($3-10 per user/month)
  • Premium ($6-21 per user/month)

Pros

Unlimited private repositories for small teams

Great integration with other Atlassian products

Powerful branch permissions and workflows

Fast and reliable performance

Cons

Less repository storage than GitHub for free plan

Missing some features of GitHub like social coding

Web interface not as polished as GitHub