Glassfish vs Mako Server
Struggling to choose between Glassfish and Mako Server? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.
Glassfish is a Development solution with tags like java, web-services, application-server.
It boasts features such as Full implementation of Java EE, High performance, Easy clustering, Integrated administration console, Developer friendly and pros including Open source, Free to use, Wide platform support, High scalability, Good documentation and community support.
On the other hand, Mako Server is a Media & Entertainment product tagged with media, server, opensource, selfhosted, movies, tv-shows, music, photos.
Its standout features include Media library management, Automatic metadata retrieval, Transcoding, Device sync, Web-based UI, Plugin support, and it shines with pros like Open source and free, Good community support, Extensive format support, Easy to set up and use, Customizable and extensible.
To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.
Glassfish
Glassfish is an open source application server that implements Java EE specifications. It is developed by Oracle and the open source community to run Java applications and web services efficiently and securely.
Categories:
Glassfish Features
- Full implementation of Java EE
- High performance
- Easy clustering
- Integrated administration console
- Developer friendly
Pricing
- Open Source
Pros
Cons
Mako Server
Mako Server is an open-source media server that allows you to store, organize, and stream your personal media library to various devices. It supports movies, TV shows, music, photos, and more.
Categories:
Mako Server Features
- Media library management
- Automatic metadata retrieval
- Transcoding
- Device sync
- Web-based UI
- Plugin support
Pricing
- Open Source
- Free