GNU Common Lisp vs CMU Common Lisp

Struggling to choose between GNU Common Lisp and CMU Common Lisp? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

GNU Common Lisp is a Development solution with tags like lisp, functional-programming, compiler, ide.

It boasts features such as Full ANSI Common Lisp implementation, Native code compiler, Integrated development environment, Debugging and profiling tools, Foreign function interface, Threading and multiprocessing support, Portable across many platforms and pros including Free and open source, High performance through native compilation, Mature and feature-rich implementation, Cross-platform compatibility, Active development community.

On the other hand, CMU Common Lisp is a Development product tagged with common-lisp, lisp, programming-language.

Its standout features include Native code compiler, Foreign function interface, Documentation generation tools, Garbage collection, Object-oriented programming support, Macro system, Debugging and profiling tools, and it shines with pros like High performance, Mature and stable, Good documentation, Active community support, Free and open source.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

GNU Common Lisp

GNU Common Lisp

GNU Common Lisp (GCL) is a free and open source implementation of the Common Lisp programming language. It features an integrated development environment, debuggers, and tools for optimization and delivery.

Categories:
lisp functional-programming compiler ide

GNU Common Lisp Features

  1. Full ANSI Common Lisp implementation
  2. Native code compiler
  3. Integrated development environment
  4. Debugging and profiling tools
  5. Foreign function interface
  6. Threading and multiprocessing support
  7. Portable across many platforms

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Free and open source

High performance through native compilation

Mature and feature-rich implementation

Cross-platform compatibility

Active development community

Cons

Limited documentation and learning resources

Not as widely used as some other Lisps

IDE is basic compared to commercial options

Some platform ports are less maintained


CMU Common Lisp

CMU Common Lisp

CMU Common Lisp is an open source implementation of the Common Lisp programming language developed at Carnegie Mellon University. It features an optimizing native code compiler, a foreign function interface, and tools for generating documentation.

Categories:
common-lisp lisp programming-language

CMU Common Lisp Features

  1. Native code compiler
  2. Foreign function interface
  3. Documentation generation tools
  4. Garbage collection
  5. Object-oriented programming support
  6. Macro system
  7. Debugging and profiling tools

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

High performance

Mature and stable

Good documentation

Active community support

Free and open source

Cons

Not as widely used as some other Lisps

Less libraries/packages than more popular Lisps

Older codebase

Limited platform support