GNU Make vs MSBuild

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

GNU Make icon
GNU Make
MSBuild icon
MSBuild

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between GNU Make and MSBuild? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

GNU Make is a Development solution with tags like build, automation, make, compiler.

It boasts features such as Dependency tracking - Automatically determines dependencies between files, Parallel builds - Can build independent targets simultaneously, Built-in functions - Many built-in functions for common build tasks, Recursive builds - Can build targets in subdirectories recursively, Pattern rules - General rules can be applied based on pattern matching, Conditionals - Supports if/else conditionals in makefiles and pros including Widely used and well-supported, Mature and stable, Powerful dependency tracking, Built-in parallelism, Portable across platforms, Integrates well with other tools.

On the other hand, MSBuild is a Development product tagged with build, automation, microsoft, net.

Its standout features include XML-based build scripts, Incremental and clean builds, NuGet package restore, Multi-targeting and multi-platform support, Extensible and customizable via tasks, and it shines with pros like Integrated into Visual Studio, Cross-platform, Powerful extensibility, Wide adoption in .NET ecosystem.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare GNU Make and MSBuild?

When evaluating GNU Make versus MSBuild, both solutions serve different needs within the development ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

GNU Make and MSBuild have established themselves in the development market. Key areas include build, automation, make.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between GNU Make and MSBuild significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include build, automation, make, compiler.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include build, automation and build, automation.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between GNU Make and MSBuild. You might also explore build, automation, make for alternative approaches.

Feature GNU Make MSBuild
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Development Development
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

GNU Make
GNU Make

Description: GNU Make is a utility that automatically builds executable programs and libraries from source code by reading files called Makefiles which specify how to derive the target program. It allows users to easily compile large projects without manually issuing the compilation commands.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

MSBuild
MSBuild

Description: MSBuild is an XML-based build automation tool developed by Microsoft. It is used to build applications and solutions across various .NET languages and platforms like .NET Framework, .NET Core, and Mono. MSBuild handles project builds, clean builds, packaging, publishing, and more.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

GNU Make
GNU Make Features
  • Dependency tracking - Automatically determines dependencies between files
  • Parallel builds - Can build independent targets simultaneously
  • Built-in functions - Many built-in functions for common build tasks
  • Recursive builds - Can build targets in subdirectories recursively
  • Pattern rules - General rules can be applied based on pattern matching
  • Conditionals - Supports if/else conditionals in makefiles
MSBuild
MSBuild Features
  • XML-based build scripts
  • Incremental and clean builds
  • NuGet package restore
  • Multi-targeting and multi-platform support
  • Extensible and customizable via tasks

Pros & Cons Analysis

GNU Make
GNU Make
Pros
  • Widely used and well-supported
  • Mature and stable
  • Powerful dependency tracking
  • Built-in parallelism
  • Portable across platforms
  • Integrates well with other tools
Cons
  • Cryptic syntax
  • Difficult for complex builds
  • Only rebuilds out-of-date targets
  • Not suitable for all project types
  • Limited to makefile build process
MSBuild
MSBuild
Pros
  • Integrated into Visual Studio
  • Cross-platform
  • Powerful extensibility
  • Wide adoption in .NET ecosystem
Cons
  • XML build scripts can be verbose
  • Steep learning curve
  • Not as fast as other build tools

Pricing Comparison

GNU Make
GNU Make
  • Open Source
MSBuild
MSBuild
  • Free
  • Open Source

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs