GoCD vs Parabuild

Struggling to choose between GoCD and Parabuild? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

GoCD is a Development solution with tags like automation, continuous-delivery, continuous-integration, deployment, release-management.

It boasts features such as Automated build pipeline creation and management, Built-in support for common build tools like Maven, Gradle, Ant, Rake, SBT, MSBuild, Make, Exec, NAnt, Phing, etc, Parallel and sequential execution of tasks, Built-in artifact repository, Value stream map to visualize build workflow, Role based access control, Plugins for integration with other tools and pros including Open source and free to use, Highly customizable and extensible via plugins, Good documentation and community support, Integrates well with other DevOps tools, Scales well for large codebases and teams.

On the other hand, Parabuild is a Development product tagged with build-automation, test-automation, release-management, version-control-integration.

Its standout features include Automated build and test execution, Continuous integration and continuous deployment, Integration with version control systems (SVN, Git, Perforce, etc.), Customizable build and test workflows, Distributed build execution across multiple servers, Reporting and notifications, Release management and deployment automation, and it shines with pros like Streamlines the build and deployment process, Provides fast feedback to developers, Supports various version control systems and programming languages, Customizable to fit different development workflows, Distributed build execution for scalability.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

GoCD

GoCD

GoCD is an open source continuous delivery server that helps automate the software release workflow. It provides visibility into builds, deployments, and testing environments to help teams release software faster and more reliably.

Categories:
automation continuous-delivery continuous-integration deployment release-management

GoCD Features

  1. Automated build pipeline creation and management
  2. Built-in support for common build tools like Maven, Gradle, Ant, Rake, SBT, MSBuild, Make, Exec, NAnt, Phing, etc
  3. Parallel and sequential execution of tasks
  4. Built-in artifact repository
  5. Value stream map to visualize build workflow
  6. Role based access control
  7. Plugins for integration with other tools

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Open source and free to use

Highly customizable and extensible via plugins

Good documentation and community support

Integrates well with other DevOps tools

Scales well for large codebases and teams

Cons

Steep learning curve

Setting up complex build pipelines can be tricky

Lacks some advanced features found in paid alternatives

Upgrades can be tricky due to breaking changes

Limited native support for Windows environments


Parabuild

Parabuild

Parabuild is an automated build tool and continuous integration server. It automatically builds and tests software projects whenever changes are made, providing fast feedback to developers. Key features include build automation, test automation, release management, and integration with version control systems.

Categories:
build-automation test-automation release-management version-control-integration

Parabuild Features

  1. Automated build and test execution
  2. Continuous integration and continuous deployment
  3. Integration with version control systems (SVN, Git, Perforce, etc.)
  4. Customizable build and test workflows
  5. Distributed build execution across multiple servers
  6. Reporting and notifications
  7. Release management and deployment automation

Pricing

  • Subscription-Based

Pros

Streamlines the build and deployment process

Provides fast feedback to developers

Supports various version control systems and programming languages

Customizable to fit different development workflows

Distributed build execution for scalability

Cons

Can be complex to set up and configure for larger projects

Limited community support and documentation compared to some other CI/CD tools

May require additional infrastructure and maintenance overhead