Groovy vs Nashorn

Struggling to choose between Groovy and Nashorn? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Groovy is a Development solution with tags like dynamic, optional-typing, java-platform, scripting, metaprogramming, functional-programming.

It boasts features such as Optional typing, Dynamic language, Static typing and compilation, Concise and familiar syntax, Seamless Java integration, Scripting capabilities, Domain-Specific Language authoring, Runtime and compile-time meta-programming, Functional programming and pros including Increases developer productivity, Simpler and less code than Java, Powerful meta-programming capabilities, Supports both dynamic and static typing, Seamless interoperability with Java code and libraries.

On the other hand, Nashorn is a Development product tagged with javascript, ecmascript, jvm, java-interoperability.

Its standout features include Lightweight high-performance JavaScript engine, Full support for ECMAScript 5.1 specification, Integrated with Java Virtual Machine (JVM), Allows embedding JavaScript code in Java applications, Enables client-side scripting using JavaScript, Interoperability between Java and JavaScript code, and it shines with pros like Fast performance, Leverages JVM features like security, scalability, Easy integration with Java code and APIs, Can access Java classes and methods from JavaScript, Reuse existing JavaScript code and libraries.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Groovy

Groovy

Groovy is a powerful, optionally typed and dynamic language, with static-typing and static compilation capabilities, for the Java platform aimed at improving developer productivity thanks to a concise, familiar and easy to learn syntax. It integrates smoothly with any Java program, and immediately delivers to your application powerful features, including scripting capabilities, Domain-Specific Language authoring, runtime and compile-time meta-programming and functional programming.

Categories:
Development Scripting Languages
dynamic optional-typing java-platform scripting metaprogramming functional-programming

Groovy Features

  1. Optional typing
  2. Dynamic language
  3. Static typing and compilation
  4. Concise and familiar syntax
  5. Seamless Java integration
  6. Scripting capabilities
  7. Domain-Specific Language authoring
  8. Runtime and compile-time meta-programming
  9. Functional programming

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Increases developer productivity

Simpler and less code than Java

Powerful meta-programming capabilities

Supports both dynamic and static typing

Seamless interoperability with Java code and libraries

Cons

Can be slower than statically compiled Java

Not as widely used as Java or other JVM languages

Less support and smaller community than Java

Not always an improvement over Java for large systems

Nashorn

Nashorn

Nashorn is a JavaScript engine integrated into the Java Virtual Machine (JVM). It allows developers to embed JavaScript code into Java applications and enable client-side scripting using JavaScript. It is lightweight, high-performance, supports the ECMAScript specification, and enables Java and JavaScript interoperability.

Categories:
Development Javascript Engines
javascript ecmascript jvm java-interoperability

Nashorn Features

  1. Lightweight high-performance JavaScript engine
  2. Full support for ECMAScript 5.1 specification
  3. Integrated with Java Virtual Machine (JVM)
  4. Allows embedding JavaScript code in Java applications
  5. Enables client-side scripting using JavaScript
  6. Interoperability between Java and JavaScript code

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Fast performance

Leverages JVM features like security, scalability

Easy integration with Java code and APIs

Can access Java classes and methods from JavaScript

Reuse existing JavaScript code and libraries

Cons

Not fully compatible with some latest ECMAScript features

Limited debugging capabilities compared to Node.js

No active development since Java 11

Lacks features of full-fledged JavaScript runtimes