Hanko vs Keycloak

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

Hanko icon
Hanko
Keycloak icon
Keycloak

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between Hanko and Keycloak? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Hanko is a Office & Productivity solution with tags like esignature, pdf, document-management.

It boasts features such as Digital signature workflow, Bulk sending of documents, Customizable email templates, Audit trail, Tamper-evident seals, Multi-factor authentication, Document templates, API access, White labeling, Role-based access control and pros including Free and open source, Integrates with popular DMS, Customizable and extensible, Secure digital signatures, Bulk sending capabilities, Audit trail for compliance, Multi-factor authentication.

On the other hand, Keycloak is a Security & Privacy product tagged with authentication, authorization, user-management, open-source.

Its standout features include Single sign-on, Identity brokering and social login, User federation, Client adapters, Admin console, and it shines with pros like Open source, Easy integration, Flexible and customizable, Robust access management capabilities.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare Hanko and Keycloak?

When evaluating Hanko versus Keycloak, both solutions serve different needs within the office & productivity ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

Hanko and Keycloak have established themselves in the office & productivity market. Key areas include esignature, pdf, document-management.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between Hanko and Keycloak significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include esignature, pdf, document-management.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include esignature, pdf and authentication, authorization.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between Hanko and Keycloak. You might also explore esignature, pdf, document-management for alternative approaches.

Feature Hanko Keycloak
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Office & Productivity Security & Privacy
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

Hanko
Hanko

Description: Hanko is an open-source eSignature solution that allows users to securely sign PDF documents. It integrates with popular document management systems to streamline workflows requiring signatures.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

Keycloak
Keycloak

Description: Keycloak is an open source identity and access management solution. It handles authentication, authorization, and user federation and makes it easy to secure applications and services. Keycloak provides out-of-the-box support for popular protocols like OpenID Connect, OAuth 2.0, and SAML 2.0.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

Hanko
Hanko Features
  • Digital signature workflow
  • Bulk sending of documents
  • Customizable email templates
  • Audit trail
  • Tamper-evident seals
  • Multi-factor authentication
  • Document templates
  • API access
  • White labeling
  • Role-based access control
Keycloak
Keycloak Features
  • Single sign-on
  • Identity brokering and social login
  • User federation
  • Client adapters
  • Admin console

Pros & Cons Analysis

Hanko
Hanko
Pros
  • Free and open source
  • Integrates with popular DMS
  • Customizable and extensible
  • Secure digital signatures
  • Bulk sending capabilities
  • Audit trail for compliance
  • Multi-factor authentication
Cons
  • Limited native mobile apps
  • Steep learning curve
  • Requires self-hosting
  • Limited native integrations
Keycloak
Keycloak
Pros
  • Open source
  • Easy integration
  • Flexible and customizable
  • Robust access management capabilities
Cons
  • Steep learning curve
  • Complex configuration
  • Limited native reporting capabilities

Pricing Comparison

Hanko
Hanko
  • Open Source
Keycloak
Keycloak
  • Open Source

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs