Hazelcast vs MongoDB

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

Hazelcast icon
Hazelcast
MongoDB icon
MongoDB

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between Hazelcast and MongoDB? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Hazelcast is a Development solution with tags like caching, processing-streams, clustering.

It boasts features such as Distributed in-memory data store, Low latency data access, Automatic sharding and rebalancing, ACID transactions, Querying and aggregation, Event journaling, Multi-datacenter replication, Web session clustering, Continuous query, Machine learning and pros including Fast performance, Easy scalability, High availability, Flexible deployment options, Open source, Rich ecosystem.

On the other hand, MongoDB is a Development product tagged with nosql, document-database, open-source.

Its standout features include Document-oriented storage, Automatic sharding, Rich and expressive query language, High availability, Horizontal scalability, and it shines with pros like Flexible schema, High performance, Easy scalability, Rich query capabilities, High availability.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare Hazelcast and MongoDB?

When evaluating Hazelcast versus MongoDB, both solutions serve different needs within the development ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

Hazelcast and MongoDB have established themselves in the development market. Key areas include caching, processing-streams, clustering.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between Hazelcast and MongoDB significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include caching, processing-streams, clustering.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include caching, processing-streams and nosql, document-database.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between Hazelcast and MongoDB. You might also explore caching, processing-streams, clustering for alternative approaches.

Feature Hazelcast MongoDB
Overall Score N/A 1
Primary Category Development Development
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

Hazelcast
Hazelcast

Description: Hazelcast is an open source in-memory data grid that enables distribution of data and computation across servers for scalability, speed, and resilience. It is commonly used for caching, processing streams, and clustering.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

MongoDB
MongoDB

Description: MongoDB is a popular open-source, document-oriented NoSQL database. It stores data in flexible, JSON-like documents, rather than rows and columns used in traditional RDBMS. MongoDB is scalable, high-performance and easy to use.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

Hazelcast
Hazelcast Features
  • Distributed in-memory data store
  • Low latency data access
  • Automatic sharding and rebalancing
  • ACID transactions
  • Querying and aggregation
  • Event journaling
  • Multi-datacenter replication
  • Web session clustering
  • Continuous query
  • Machine learning
MongoDB
MongoDB Features
  • Document-oriented storage
  • Automatic sharding
  • Rich and expressive query language
  • High availability
  • Horizontal scalability

Pros & Cons Analysis

Hazelcast
Hazelcast
Pros
  • Fast performance
  • Easy scalability
  • High availability
  • Flexible deployment options
  • Open source
  • Rich ecosystem
Cons
  • Complex configuration
  • Steep learning curve
  • No visual interface
MongoDB
MongoDB
Pros
  • Flexible schema
  • High performance
  • Easy scalability
  • Rich query capabilities
  • High availability
Cons
  • No transactions
  • No joins
  • Limited query flexibility compared to SQL
  • Steep learning curve

Pricing Comparison

Hazelcast
Hazelcast
  • Open Source
  • Enterprise Edition (Subscription)
MongoDB
MongoDB
  • Open Source
  • Subscription-Based

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs