HttpWatch vs OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

HttpWatch icon
HttpWatch
OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) icon
OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between HttpWatch and OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

HttpWatch is a Development solution with tags like http, network, debugging.

It boasts features such as Captures all HTTP traffic between browser and server, Inspects headers, parameters, cookies, timings, Analyzes page load performance, Identifies slow requests, Checks for failed requests, Monitors AJAX requests, Supports HTTP/1.1 and HTTP/2, Integrates with developer tools in IE, Chrome, Firefox, Provides API for automating tests, Offers advanced session analysis, Includes caching analysis, Supports SSL decryption and pros including Comprehensive HTTP inspection, Detailed performance metrics, Easy to use interface, Integrates into browsers, Automation capabilities, Advanced analysis features.

On the other hand, OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) is a Security & Privacy product tagged with security, web-app-scanner, vulnerability-scanner, penetration-testing, owasp.

Its standout features include Spidering and crawling of web applications, Passive scanning for analysis of requests and responses, Active scanning for vulnerability detection, AJAX spidering for crawling of modern web apps, Variety of attack tools for penetration testing, Extensible via add-ons for advanced functions, Built-in proxy for traffic inspection and modification, Automated and manual testing options, Command line and GUI interfaces, Authentication tools for session management, Integrations with CI/CD pipelines, APIs for integration with other tools, Exporting of reports in various formats, and it shines with pros like Free and open source, Easy to use interface, Powerful scanning capabilities, Active community support and development, Cross-platform compatibility, Extensible and customizable via plugins, Integrates well with other tools, Helps identify a wide range of vulnerabilities.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare HttpWatch and OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)?

When evaluating HttpWatch versus OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP), both solutions serve different needs within the development ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

HttpWatch and OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) have established themselves in the development market. Key areas include http, network, debugging.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between HttpWatch and OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include http, network, debugging.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include http, network and security, web-app-scanner.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between HttpWatch and OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP). You might also explore http, network, debugging for alternative approaches.

Feature HttpWatch OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Development Security & Privacy
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

HttpWatch
HttpWatch

Description: HttpWatch is a developer tool for debugging and analyzing HTTP requests. It captures all HTTP traffic between the browser and server, letting developers inspect headers, parameters, cookies, timings, and more to optimize web pages and applications.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)
OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)

Description: ZAP is an open-source web application security scanner used to find vulnerabilities in web apps. It offers automated and manual tools to scan APIs, access control weaknesses, injection flaws, XSS, and other issues.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

HttpWatch
HttpWatch Features
  • Captures all HTTP traffic between browser and server
  • Inspects headers, parameters, cookies, timings
  • Analyzes page load performance
  • Identifies slow requests
  • Checks for failed requests
  • Monitors AJAX requests
  • Supports HTTP/1.1 and HTTP/2
  • Integrates with developer tools in IE, Chrome, Firefox
  • Provides API for automating tests
  • Offers advanced session analysis
  • Includes caching analysis
  • Supports SSL decryption
OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)
OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP) Features
  • Spidering and crawling of web applications
  • Passive scanning for analysis of requests and responses
  • Active scanning for vulnerability detection
  • AJAX spidering for crawling of modern web apps
  • Variety of attack tools for penetration testing
  • Extensible via add-ons for advanced functions
  • Built-in proxy for traffic inspection and modification
  • Automated and manual testing options
  • Command line and GUI interfaces
  • Authentication tools for session management
  • Integrations with CI/CD pipelines
  • APIs for integration with other tools
  • Exporting of reports in various formats

Pros & Cons Analysis

HttpWatch
HttpWatch
Pros
  • Comprehensive HTTP inspection
  • Detailed performance metrics
  • Easy to use interface
  • Integrates into browsers
  • Automation capabilities
  • Advanced analysis features
Cons
  • No browser plugin for Safari
  • Limited to Windows platform
  • Steep learning curve for advanced features
OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)
OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)
Pros
  • Free and open source
  • Easy to use interface
  • Powerful scanning capabilities
  • Active community support and development
  • Cross-platform compatibility
  • Extensible and customizable via plugins
  • Integrates well with other tools
  • Helps identify a wide range of vulnerabilities
Cons
  • Can generate false positives
  • Limited default policies for authentication
  • Requires expertise to leverage advanced features
  • Not as feature rich as commercial products
  • Lacks official technical support services

Pricing Comparison

HttpWatch
HttpWatch
  • Free version with limited features
  • One-time purchase for Standard and Professional editions
  • Volume licensing available
OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)
OWASP Zed Attack Proxy (ZAP)
  • Open Source

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs