i3-gaps vs JWM

Struggling to choose between i3-gaps and JWM? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

i3-gaps is a Os & Utilities solution with tags like tiling, keyboarddriven, lightweight, customizable, gaps-between-windows.

It boasts features such as Tiling window manager, Keyboard driven, Customizable via config file, Gaps between windows, Split-screen functionality, Workspace support, Status bar and pros including Lightweight and fast, Efficient use of screen space, Very customizable, Keyboard shortcuts for everything, Low resource usage.

On the other hand, JWM is a Os & Utilities product tagged with lightweight, configurable, x11-windowing-system.

Its standout features include Lightweight and fast, Small memory footprint, Highly configurable, Simple panel and menu system, Supports multiple workspaces, Theme support, Keyboard shortcuts, and it shines with pros like Very fast and responsive, Low resource usage, Highly customizable, Good for older or low-powered hardware, Actively developed and maintained.

Feature	i3-gaps	JWM
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Os & Utilities	Os & Utilities

Product Overview

i3-gaps

Description: i3-gaps is a fork of the i3 tiling window manager that adds additional functionality like gaps between windows. It's lightweight, customizable, and keyboard-driven.

JWM

Description: JWM is a lightweight window manager for the X11 windowing system. It is fast, very small, and highly configurable. It comes with a simple panel and menu system and works well for resource-constrained environments.

Key Features Comparison

i3-gaps Features

• Tiling window manager
• Keyboard driven
• Customizable via config file
• Gaps between windows
• Split-screen functionality
• Workspace support
• Status bar

JWM Features

• Lightweight and fast
• Small memory footprint
• Highly configurable
• Simple panel and menu system
• Supports multiple workspaces
• Theme support
• Keyboard shortcuts

Pros & Cons Analysis

i3-gaps

Pros

• Lightweight and fast
• Efficient use of screen space
• Very customizable
• Keyboard shortcuts for everything
• Low resource usage

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Manual configuration required
• Not beginner friendly
• No mouse support
• Limited desktop effects

JWM

Pros

• Very fast and responsive
• Low resource usage
• Highly customizable
• Good for older or low-powered hardware
• Actively developed and maintained

Cons

• Less features than full desktop environments
• Manual configuration required
• Less intuitive than beginner-friendly WMs
• Limited theme support compared to others

Pricing Comparison

i3-gaps

• Open Source

JWM

• Open Source
• Free