Invicti (Netsparker) vs IronWASP

Struggling to choose between Invicti (Netsparker) and IronWASP? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Invicti (Netsparker) is a Security & Privacy solution with tags like web-security, vulnerability-scanner, web-app-scanner, sql-injection, xss, security-testing.

It boasts features such as Crawls entire websites and APIs to find vulnerabilities, Scans JavaScript files and APIs, Prioritizes high and critical risk vulnerabilities, Integrates with CI/CD pipelines, Provides proof-of-concept and remediation guidance, Has plugin support for IDEs and build tools and pros including Very accurate and low false positive rate, Easy to use interface and configuration, Detailed vulnerability reports, Flexible authentication configuration, Integrates seamlessly into DevOps workflows, Good customer support.

On the other hand, IronWASP is a Security & Privacy product tagged with web-security, penetration-testing, vulnerability-scanning.

Its standout features include Automated scanning and exploitation of vulnerabilities, Custom scripting for advanced tests, Integration with Burp Suite, Authentication scanning, Crawling and mapping of web apps, Reporting of findings, and it shines with pros like Free and open source, Easy to use interface, Powerful scanning and exploitation capabilities, Extendable via custom scripts, Integrates with other tools like Burp Suite.

Feature	Invicti (Netsparker)	IronWASP
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Security & Privacy	Security & Privacy

Product Overview

Invicti (Netsparker)

Description: Invicti (Netsparker) is a web application security scanner that helps identify vulnerabilities in web apps and APIs. It can automatically crawl web applications, analyze the code, and detect SQL injection, cross-site scripting, and other vulnerabilities. Invicti is easy to use and provides detailed vulnerability reports.

IronWASP

Description: IronWASP is an open-source web application security testing tool. It allows developers to find and exploit vulnerabilities in web apps to help strengthen security.

Key Features Comparison

Invicti (Netsparker) Features

• Crawls entire websites and APIs to find vulnerabilities
• Scans JavaScript files and APIs
• Prioritizes high and critical risk vulnerabilities
• Integrates with CI/CD pipelines
• Provides proof-of-concept and remediation guidance
• Has plugin support for IDEs and build tools

IronWASP Features

• Automated scanning and exploitation of vulnerabilities
• Custom scripting for advanced tests
• Integration with Burp Suite
• Authentication scanning
• Crawling and mapping of web apps
• Reporting of findings

Pros & Cons Analysis

Invicti (Netsparker)

Pros

• Very accurate and low false positive rate
• Easy to use interface and configuration
• Detailed vulnerability reports
• Flexible authentication configuration
• Integrates seamlessly into DevOps workflows
• Good customer support

Cons

• Can be resource intensive for large apps
• Lacks custom authentication modules
• Compliance reporting needs improvement
• Limited integrations compared to competitors

IronWASP

Pros

• Free and open source
• Easy to use interface
• Powerful scanning and exploitation capabilities
• Extendable via custom scripts
• Integrates with other tools like Burp Suite

Cons

• Limited documentation
• Not as full-featured as commercial products
• Requires technical knowledge to use advanced features
• Prone to false positives if not tuned properly

Pricing Comparison

Invicti (Netsparker)

• Subscription-Based

IronWASP

• Open Source