JBehave vs Cucumber

Struggling to choose between JBehave and Cucumber? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

JBehave is a Development solution with tags like bdd, java, jvm, testing-framework.

It boasts features such as Allows writing stories/scenarios in natural language using Gherkin syntax, Provides a rich set of matchers for defining steps, Supports data tables for providing example data, Integrates with JUnit for running stories as tests, Generates reports in HTML, XML etc. to document stories, Supports extending framework via Java APIs and pros including Promotes collaboration between devs, QA and business analysts, Documentation using stories serves as specifications, Natural language syntax is easy to read and understand, Abstracts away testing code from specifications.

On the other hand, Cucumber is a Development product tagged with bdd, testing-framework, plain-language.

Its standout features include Plain text language (Gherkin) for writing tests, Integration with popular programming languages like Ruby, Java, JavaScript etc, Built-in support for generating test reports, Ability to automate web, mobile, desktop apps, Integration with continuous integration tools, Reusable step definitions, Tags for organizing tests, and it shines with pros like Improves communication between teams, Tests are readable by non-technical people, Focuses on behavior rather than implementation, Reusable test components, Active open source community.

Feature	JBehave	Cucumber
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

JBehave

Description: JBehave is an open source behavior-driven development (BDD) framework for Java and JVM languages. It allows developers to write specifications using natural language and automates the testing process.

Cucumber

Description: Cucumber is an open source testing framework that supports behavior-driven development (BDD). It allows you to write tests in plain language that describes the behavior of the application, which helps bridge the communication gap between technical and non-technical teams.

Key Features Comparison

JBehave Features

• Allows writing stories/scenarios in natural language using Gherkin syntax
• Provides a rich set of matchers for defining steps
• Supports data tables for providing example data
• Integrates with JUnit for running stories as tests
• Generates reports in HTML, XML etc. to document stories
• Supports extending framework via Java APIs

Cucumber Features

• Plain text language (Gherkin) for writing tests
• Integration with popular programming languages like Ruby, Java, JavaScript etc
• Built-in support for generating test reports
• Ability to automate web, mobile, desktop apps
• Integration with continuous integration tools
• Reusable step definitions
• Tags for organizing tests

Pros & Cons Analysis

JBehave

Pros

• Promotes collaboration between devs, QA and business analysts
• Documentation using stories serves as specifications
• Natural language syntax is easy to read and understand
• Abstracts away testing code from specifications

Cons

• Steep learning curve for BDD concepts and practices
• More overhead compared to traditional unit testing frameworks
• Poor IDE support and lack of code completion
• Limited types of testing supported out of the box

Cucumber

Pros

• Improves communication between teams
• Tests are readable by non-technical people
• Focuses on behavior rather than implementation
• Reusable test components
• Active open source community

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Difficult troubleshooting
• Slow test execution
• Brittle tests
• Hard to scale and maintain large test suites

Pricing Comparison

JBehave

• Open Source

Cucumber

• Open Source