LambdaTest vs Sorry Cypress

Struggling to choose between LambdaTest and Sorry Cypress? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

LambdaTest is a Development solution with tags like crossbrowser-testing, responsive-testing, realtime-testing, live-testing.

It boasts features such as Cross browser testing, Responsive testing, Live interactive testing, Automated screenshot testing, Geolocation testing, Console error logging, Page speed testing, Video recording, Debugging tools and pros including Supports a wide range of browsers and devices, Easy to use interface, Fast test execution, Integration with CI/CD tools, Scalable testing.

On the other hand, Sorry Cypress is a Development product tagged with endtoend-testing, web-application-testing, open-source, lightweight.

Its standout features include Lightweight and fast end-to-end testing, Open source with MIT license, Supports TypeScript tests, Automatic waiting and retries, Time traveling debugger, Screenshots and videos on failures, Runs in CI pipelines, and it shines with pros like Lightweight and faster than Cypress, Completely open source, Easy to install and use, Robust automatic waiting and retries, Helpful debugging capabilities, Integrates well with CI/CD workflows.

Feature	LambdaTest	Sorry Cypress
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

LambdaTest

Description: LambdaTest is a cloud-based cross browser testing platform that allows users to test their websites and web apps across 2000+ different browsers, browser versions and operating systems. It provides features like responsive testing, real-time cross browser testing, live interactive testing, and more.

Sorry Cypress

Description: Sorry Cypress is an open-source, lightweight alternative to Cypress for end-to-end testing web applications. It provides fast and reliable testing without the overhead of Cypress.

Key Features Comparison

LambdaTest Features

• Cross browser testing
• Responsive testing
• Live interactive testing
• Automated screenshot testing
• Geolocation testing
• Console error logging
• Page speed testing
• Video recording
• Debugging tools

Sorry Cypress Features

• Lightweight and fast end-to-end testing
• Open source with MIT license
• Supports TypeScript tests
• Automatic waiting and retries
• Time traveling debugger
• Screenshots and videos on failures
• Runs in CI pipelines

Pros & Cons Analysis

LambdaTest

Pros

• Supports a wide range of browsers and devices
• Easy to use interface
• Fast test execution
• Integration with CI/CD tools
• Scalable testing

Cons

• No mobile app testing support
• Limited support for native apps
• Steep learning curve for advanced features

Sorry Cypress

Pros

• Lightweight and faster than Cypress
• Completely open source
• Easy to install and use
• Robust automatic waiting and retries
• Helpful debugging capabilities
• Integrates well with CI/CD workflows

Cons

• Less comprehensive documentation than Cypress
• Smaller community than leading options
• Lacks browser automation beyond Chromium
• Minimal customization compared to Cypress
• Lacks interactive test runner UI

Pricing Comparison

LambdaTest

• Free
• Subscription-Based

Sorry Cypress

• Open Source