LibreSSL vs mbed TLS

Struggling to choose between LibreSSL and mbed TLS? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

LibreSSL is a Security & Privacy solution with tags like encryption, ssltls, cryptography, security.

It boasts features such as Fork of OpenSSL created in response to Heartbleed vulnerability, Focused on modernizing the codebase and improving security, Removes unused legacy code and features from OpenSSL, Simplified build system and configuration, Supports TLS, SSL, cryptography and X.509 certificates like OpenSSL and pros including Improved security and code quality over OpenSSL, Regular security audits and fuzz testing, More active development than OpenSSL, Removes obsolete platforms and features, Smaller codebase that is easier to maintain, Compatible API with OpenSSL.

On the other hand, mbed TLS is a Security & Privacy product tagged with cryptography, tls, ssl, embedded-systems.

Its standout features include TLS/SSL protocol implementation, Cryptographic algorithms and ciphers, X.509 certificate handling, Authentication and encryption, Hardware acceleration support, Lightweight and modular codebase, and it shines with pros like Free and open source, Compact code and small memory footprint, Highly configurable and customizable, Permissive Apache 2.0 license, Support for a wide range of platforms and architectures, Active development and maintenance.

Feature	LibreSSL	mbed TLS
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Security & Privacy	Security & Privacy

Product Overview

LibreSSL

Description: LibreSSL is a free and open source cryptographic software library, forked from OpenSSL in 2014 after the Heartbleed vulnerability was disclosed. It aims to be a modern, efficient, and secure replacement for OpenSSL.

mbed TLS

Description: mbed TLS is an open source cryptographic library that provides TLS and SSL capabilities for embedded devices. It is designed to be compact, fast, and flexible enough for both small and large embedded systems.

Key Features Comparison

LibreSSL Features

• Fork of OpenSSL created in response to Heartbleed vulnerability
• Focused on modernizing the codebase and improving security
• Removes unused legacy code and features from OpenSSL
• Simplified build system and configuration
• Supports TLS, SSL, cryptography and X.509 certificates like OpenSSL

mbed TLS Features

• TLS/SSL protocol implementation
• Cryptographic algorithms and ciphers
• X.509 certificate handling
• Authentication and encryption
• Hardware acceleration support
• Lightweight and modular codebase

Pros & Cons Analysis

LibreSSL

Pros

• Improved security and code quality over OpenSSL
• Regular security audits and fuzz testing
• More active development than OpenSSL
• Removes obsolete platforms and features
• Smaller codebase that is easier to maintain
• Compatible API with OpenSSL

Cons

• Lacks some enterprise features of OpenSSL
• Fewer protocol options than OpenSSL
• Less widely deployed than OpenSSL currently
• Limited Windows support
• Smaller developer community than OpenSSL

mbed TLS

Pros

• Free and open source
• Compact code and small memory footprint
• Highly configurable and customizable
• Permissive Apache 2.0 license
• Support for a wide range of platforms and architectures
• Active development and maintenance

Cons

• Limited native HTTPS server implementation
• Lacks some advanced TLS features
• Not as widely used as OpenSSL
• Requires cryptographic expertise to configure securely
• Limited hardware acceleration support

Pricing Comparison

LibreSSL

• Open Source

mbed TLS

• Open Source