Loadrunner vs Apache JMeter

Struggling to choose between Loadrunner and Apache JMeter? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Loadrunner is a Development solution with tags like load-testing, performance-monitoring, concurrency-simulation.

It boasts features such as Load and performance testing, Web services testing, Mobile app testing, API testing, Database load testing, Network bandwidth simulation, Integrates with CI/CD pipelines and pros including Comprehensive load testing capabilities, Scalable to simulate thousands of concurrent users, Integrates with many monitoring and analytics tools, Can test a wide variety of applications and protocols, Mature product with wide adoption.

On the other hand, Apache JMeter is a Development product tagged with performance-testing, load-testing, web-application-testing, open-source.

Its standout features include Load testing, Stress testing, Performance benchmarking, Web - HTTP, HTTPS, SOAP, REST, etc, Database via JDBC, FTP, LDAP, Message-oriented middleware (MOM) via JMS, Mail - SMTP(S), POP3(S) and IMAP(S), Native commands or shell scripts, TCP, Java Objects, and it shines with pros like Open source, Cross platform (Windows, Linux, Mac), Highly extensible via plugins, Supports many protocols and technologies, CLI and GUI modes, Can be integrated with CI/CD pipelines, Good community support.

Feature	Loadrunner	Apache JMeter
Overall Score	N/A	1
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Loadrunner

Description: Loadrunner is a performance testing and monitoring software that is used to test and analyze software applications. It allows you to simulate thousands of users concurrently accessing an application, generate realistic workloads, and identify performance issues.

Apache JMeter

Description: Apache JMeter, an open-source tool for performance and load testing of applications. Empower developers and testers to simulate various user scenarios, measure performance metrics, and identify bottlenecks. Apache JMeter supports a wide range of protocols, including HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, SOAP, and more.

Key Features Comparison

Loadrunner Features

• Load and performance testing
• Web services testing
• Mobile app testing
• API testing
• Database load testing
• Network bandwidth simulation
• Integrates with CI/CD pipelines

Apache JMeter Features

• Load testing
• Stress testing
• Performance benchmarking
• Web - HTTP, HTTPS, SOAP, REST, etc
• Database via JDBC
• FTP
• LDAP
• Message-oriented middleware (MOM) via JMS
• Mail - SMTP(S), POP3(S) and IMAP(S)
• Native commands or shell scripts
• TCP
• Java Objects

Pros & Cons Analysis

Loadrunner

Pros

• Comprehensive load testing capabilities
• Scalable to simulate thousands of concurrent users
• Integrates with many monitoring and analytics tools
• Can test a wide variety of applications and protocols
• Mature product with wide adoption

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Scripting and test creation can be complex
• Limited support for latest web technologies
• Expensive licensing model
• Requires add-ons for full functionality

Apache JMeter

Pros

• Open source
• Cross platform (Windows, Linux, Mac)
• Highly extensible via plugins
• Supports many protocols and technologies
• CLI and GUI modes
• Can be integrated with CI/CD pipelines
• Good community support

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Configuring tests can be complex
• GUI has outdated design
• Not ideal for mobile app testing
• Lacks built-in developer collaboration features

Pricing Comparison

Loadrunner

• Subscription-Based
• Pay-As-You-Go

Apache JMeter

• Open Source