Loadrunner vs locust

Struggling to choose between Loadrunner and locust? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Loadrunner is a Development solution with tags like load-testing, performance-monitoring, concurrency-simulation.

It boasts features such as Load and performance testing, Web services testing, Mobile app testing, API testing, Database load testing, Network bandwidth simulation, Integrates with CI/CD pipelines and pros including Comprehensive load testing capabilities, Scalable to simulate thousands of concurrent users, Integrates with many monitoring and analytics tools, Can test a wide variety of applications and protocols, Mature product with wide adoption.

On the other hand, locust is a Development product tagged with load-testing, performance-testing, web-application-testing.

Its standout features include Distributed load testing, Scripting using Python, Simulate thousands of concurrent users, Web-based UI, CSV results output, Can test any system that has a HTTP interface, and it shines with pros like Open source, Easy to use, Scalable, Good documentation, Active community support.

Feature	Loadrunner	locust
Overall Score	N/A	1
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Loadrunner

Description: Loadrunner is a performance testing and monitoring software that is used to test and analyze software applications. It allows you to simulate thousands of users concurrently accessing an application, generate realistic workloads, and identify performance issues.

locust

Description: Locust is an open source load and performance testing tool written in Python. It allows developers to test the performance of their web applications by simulating large numbers of concurrent users making requests.

Key Features Comparison

Loadrunner Features

• Load and performance testing
• Web services testing
• Mobile app testing
• API testing
• Database load testing
• Network bandwidth simulation
• Integrates with CI/CD pipelines

locust Features

• Distributed load testing
• Scripting using Python
• Simulate thousands of concurrent users
• Web-based UI
• CSV results output
• Can test any system that has a HTTP interface

Pros & Cons Analysis

Loadrunner

Pros

• Comprehensive load testing capabilities
• Scalable to simulate thousands of concurrent users
• Integrates with many monitoring and analytics tools
• Can test a wide variety of applications and protocols
• Mature product with wide adoption

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Scripting and test creation can be complex
• Limited support for latest web technologies
• Expensive licensing model
• Requires add-ons for full functionality

locust

Pros

• Open source
• Easy to use
• Scalable
• Good documentation
• Active community support

Cons

• Only supports HTTP protocol
• Limited reporting capabilities
• Steep learning curve for advanced usage

Pricing Comparison

Loadrunner

• Subscription-Based
• Pay-As-You-Go

locust

• Open Source