LXC Linux Containers vs OpenVZ

Struggling to choose between LXC Linux Containers and OpenVZ? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

LXC Linux Containers is a Os & Utilities solution with tags like containers, virtualization, linux.

It boasts features such as OS-level virtualization for running multiple isolated Linux systems on a single host, Resource isolation of CPU, memory, block I/O, network, etc, Near-native performance with minimal overhead, Live migration of containers between hosts, Snapshots and cloning of containers, Support for different Linux distributions, Integration with common orchestration tools like Kubernetes and pros including Lightweight and efficient resource utilization, Near-native performance compared to full virtualization, Easy to deploy and manage at scale, Allows consolidating services on fewer servers, Enables portable workloads across environments, Integrates well with automation and orchestration tools.

On the other hand, OpenVZ is a Os & Utilities product tagged with containers, virtualization, linux.

Its standout features include OS-level virtualization, Resource isolation, Overcommitting of physical resources, Live migration of containers, Templates for fast deployment, and it shines with pros like Lightweight and efficient, Good performance, Easy to manage, Scalable.

Feature	LXC Linux Containers	OpenVZ
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Os & Utilities	Os & Utilities

Product Overview

LXC Linux Containers

Description: LXC Linux Containers (LXC) provides lightweight, operating system-level virtualization on Linux. It allows running multiple isolated Linux systems on a single host with minimal resource overhead.

OpenVZ

Description: OpenVZ is an open source container-based virtualization platform for Linux. It allows multiple isolated virtual containers to run on a single physical server, sharing the same Linux kernel.

Key Features Comparison

LXC Linux Containers Features

• OS-level virtualization for running multiple isolated Linux systems on a single host
• Resource isolation of CPU, memory, block I/O, network, etc
• Near-native performance with minimal overhead
• Live migration of containers between hosts
• Snapshots and cloning of containers
• Support for different Linux distributions
• Integration with common orchestration tools like Kubernetes

OpenVZ Features

• OS-level virtualization
• Resource isolation
• Overcommitting of physical resources
• Live migration of containers
• Templates for fast deployment

Pros & Cons Analysis

LXC Linux Containers

Pros

• Lightweight and efficient resource utilization
• Near-native performance compared to full virtualization
• Easy to deploy and manage at scale
• Allows consolidating services on fewer servers
• Enables portable workloads across environments
• Integrates well with automation and orchestration tools

Cons

• Less isolation than full virtualization
• Shared kernel so host security issues can affect containers
• Limitations around running non-Linux or mix of Linux distros
• Less support for Windows services/tools
• Steeper learning curve than full virtualization

OpenVZ

Pros

• Lightweight and efficient
• Good performance
• Easy to manage
• Scalable

Cons

• Limited customization compared to VMs
• Less flexible than Docker
• Lacks native live storage migration
• Not as widely supported as other solutions

Pricing Comparison

LXC Linux Containers

• Open Source

OpenVZ

• Open Source