Mastodon vs GNU social

Struggling to choose between Mastodon and GNU social? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Mastodon is a Social & Communications solution with tags like opensource, decentralized, social-media, twitter-alternative.

It boasts features such as Decentralized social network - no single company/server owns the network, Open source codebase allows anyone to run a server, Federated timeline shows posts from all servers you follow, Granular privacy controls for posts - public, followers-only, etc, Media attachments like images and videos, Short post limit compared to other platforms, Chronological timeline with no algorithmic sorting and pros including Avoids censorship and data mining risks of centralized platforms, User-run servers can have customized rules and moderation, Not dependent on decisions or business model of a single company, Can follow users on different servers within the network.

On the other hand, GNU social is a Social & Communications product tagged with decentralized, open-source, privacy, twittercompatible.

Its standout features include Decentralized social network, User data privacy and control, Open protocols and APIs, Interoperability with Twitter, Media embedding, Hashtags, Groups and lists, Notifications, and it shines with pros like User data privacy, No central authority, Open source and transparent, Interoperable with other networks, Free to use.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.