Materialize vs 960 Grid System

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

Materialize icon
Materialize
960 Grid System icon
960 Grid System

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between Materialize and 960 Grid System? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Materialize is a Development solution with tags like material-design, responsive, ui-components, web-development.

It boasts features such as Responsive grid system, Pre-built UI components, Material Design principles, SASS-based styling, Customizable themes, JavaScript plugins and pros including Open source and free, Large component library, Good documentation, Active community support, Works with many frameworks, Mobile-friendly and responsive.

On the other hand, 960 Grid System is a Development product tagged with responsive, css, framework, grid.

Its standout features include 12 column responsive grid, Predefined CSS classes for layout, Support for mobile, tablet and desktop screens, Easy to customize, Lightweight code, and it shines with pros like Easy to learn and implement, Flexible grid system, Works well for rapid prototyping, Good for basic website layouts, Wide browser support.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare Materialize and 960 Grid System?

When evaluating Materialize versus 960 Grid System, both solutions serve different needs within the development ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

Materialize and 960 Grid System have established themselves in the development market. Key areas include material-design, responsive, ui-components.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between Materialize and 960 Grid System significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include material-design, responsive, ui-components, web-development.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include material-design, responsive and responsive, css.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between Materialize and 960 Grid System. You might also explore material-design, responsive, ui-components for alternative approaches.

Feature Materialize 960 Grid System
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Development Development
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

Materialize
Materialize

Description: Materialize is an open-source front-end framework based on Material Design principles. It provides UI components like buttons, cards, navigation, grids, and more to help developers quickly build responsive web apps with a modern look and feel.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

960 Grid System
960 Grid System

Description: The 960 Grid System is a responsive CSS framework that provides a flexible grid with 12 and 16 columns to build websites. It helps web designers quickly create layouts using CSS without having to write all the CSS from scratch.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

Materialize
Materialize Features
  • Responsive grid system
  • Pre-built UI components
  • Material Design principles
  • SASS-based styling
  • Customizable themes
  • JavaScript plugins
960 Grid System
960 Grid System Features
  • 12 column responsive grid
  • Predefined CSS classes for layout
  • Support for mobile, tablet and desktop screens
  • Easy to customize
  • Lightweight code

Pros & Cons Analysis

Materialize
Materialize
Pros
  • Open source and free
  • Large component library
  • Good documentation
  • Active community support
  • Works with many frameworks
  • Mobile-friendly and responsive
Cons
  • Less customizable than other frameworks
  • Steep learning curve
  • Not as feature-rich as paid options
  • Dependent on jQuery
960 Grid System
960 Grid System
Pros
  • Easy to learn and implement
  • Flexible grid system
  • Works well for rapid prototyping
  • Good for basic website layouts
  • Wide browser support
Cons
  • Less flexible than other grid frameworks
  • Not ideal for complex layouts
  • Limited built-in components
  • Requires adding other libraries for advanced features
  • Not frequently updated

Pricing Comparison

Materialize
Materialize
  • Open Source
960 Grid System
960 Grid System
  • Open Source

Get More Information

Materialize
Materialize
Materialize
Learn More About Materialize
960 Grid System
960 Grid System
960 Grid System
Learn More About 960 Grid System

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs

Browse More Software
Back to Homepage
Company
Explore
Resources

Find what fits. Forget the rest.

© 2025 Sugggest.com. All Rights Reserved.
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Legal