Materialize vs Metro UI CSS

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

Materialize icon
Materialize
Metro UI CSS icon
Metro UI CSS

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between Materialize and Metro UI CSS? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Materialize is a Development solution with tags like material-design, responsive, ui-components, web-development.

It boasts features such as Responsive grid system, Pre-built UI components, Material Design principles, SASS-based styling, Customizable themes, JavaScript plugins and pros including Open source and free, Large component library, Good documentation, Active community support, Works with many frameworks, Mobile-friendly and responsive.

On the other hand, Metro UI CSS is a Development product tagged with css, less, javascript, ui, ux, windows-8, metro.

Its standout features include Responsive design, Touch friendly, Customizable components, Lightweight code, Easy to integrate, and it shines with pros like Open source, Good documentation, Active community support, Compatible with many frameworks, Good selection of UI components.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare Materialize and Metro UI CSS?

When evaluating Materialize versus Metro UI CSS, both solutions serve different needs within the development ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

Materialize and Metro UI CSS have established themselves in the development market. Key areas include material-design, responsive, ui-components.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between Materialize and Metro UI CSS significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include material-design, responsive, ui-components, web-development.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include material-design, responsive and css, less.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between Materialize and Metro UI CSS. You might also explore material-design, responsive, ui-components for alternative approaches.

Feature Materialize Metro UI CSS
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Development Development
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

Materialize
Materialize

Description: Materialize is an open-source front-end framework based on Material Design principles. It provides UI components like buttons, cards, navigation, grids, and more to help developers quickly build responsive web apps with a modern look and feel.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

Metro UI CSS
Metro UI CSS

Description: Metro UI CSS is a free front-end framework for developers to create websites and apps with a Windows 8 Metro user interface style. It includes CSS/LESS styles, fonts, and JavaScript components like tiles, tabs, accordions and more.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

Materialize
Materialize Features
  • Responsive grid system
  • Pre-built UI components
  • Material Design principles
  • SASS-based styling
  • Customizable themes
  • JavaScript plugins
Metro UI CSS
Metro UI CSS Features
  • Responsive design
  • Touch friendly
  • Customizable components
  • Lightweight code
  • Easy to integrate

Pros & Cons Analysis

Materialize
Materialize
Pros
  • Open source and free
  • Large component library
  • Good documentation
  • Active community support
  • Works with many frameworks
  • Mobile-friendly and responsive
Cons
  • Less customizable than other frameworks
  • Steep learning curve
  • Not as feature-rich as paid options
  • Dependent on jQuery
Metro UI CSS
Metro UI CSS
Pros
  • Open source
  • Good documentation
  • Active community support
  • Compatible with many frameworks
  • Good selection of UI components
Cons
  • Limited customization options
  • Not frequently updated
  • Lacks advanced components
  • Not suitable for complex applications
  • Windows 8 style may feel outdated

Pricing Comparison

Materialize
Materialize
  • Open Source
Metro UI CSS
Metro UI CSS
  • Open Source

Get More Information

Materialize
Materialize
Materialize
Learn More About Materialize
Metro UI CSS
Metro UI CSS
Metro UI CSS
Learn More About Metro UI CSS

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs

Browse More Software
Back to Homepage
Company
Explore
Resources

Better software starts here.

© 2025 Sugggest.com. All Rights Reserved.
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Legal