Matomo vs Glew

Struggling to choose between Matomo and Glew? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Matomo is a Online Services solution with tags like analytics, tracking, privacy, opensource.

It boasts features such as Real-time analytics, Customizable dashboards, Goal and funnel tracking, Heatmaps, A/B testing, Custom segments, API access, Plugin ecosystem and pros including Open source and self-hosted, Strong focus on privacy, Powerful free community edition, Highly customizable and extensible.

On the other hand, Glew is a Development product tagged with opengl, extensions, c, graphics.

Its standout features include Loads OpenGL core and extension functions at run-time, Efficient run-time mechanisms to check which OpenGL extensions are supported, Thread-safe and platform independent, Written in clean C code with no dependencies, and it shines with pros like Simple and easy to use, Lightweight with minimal overhead, Wide support for OpenGL versions and extensions, Actively maintained and updated.

Feature	Matomo	Glew
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Online Services	Development

Product Overview

Matomo

Description: Matomo is an open-source web analytics platform that focuses on data privacy. It can track visits, page views, downloads, and more on websites, apps, etc. Matomo aims to provide valuable insights while letting users retain control over their data.

Glew

Description: Glew is an open source C/C++ extension loading library that enables applications to access OpenGL API and extensions. It provides efficient run-time mechanisms for determining which OpenGL extensions are supported on the target platform.

Key Features Comparison

Matomo Features

• Real-time analytics
• Customizable dashboards
• Goal and funnel tracking
• Heatmaps
• A/B testing
• Custom segments
• API access
• Plugin ecosystem

Glew Features

• Loads OpenGL core and extension functions at run-time
• Efficient run-time mechanisms to check which OpenGL extensions are supported
• Thread-safe and platform independent
• Written in clean C code with no dependencies

Pros & Cons Analysis

Matomo

Pros

• Open source and self-hosted
• Strong focus on privacy
• Powerful free community edition
• Highly customizable and extensible

Cons

• Steeper learning curve than some tools
• Requires technical expertise to set up and manage
• Limited support options

Glew

Pros

• Simple and easy to use
• Lightweight with minimal overhead
• Wide support for OpenGL versions and extensions
• Actively maintained and updated

Cons

• Limited documentation
• Requires some OpenGL knowledge for effective use
• Only focused on OpenGL functions (no other graphics APIs)
• Not all extensions may be supported

Pricing Comparison

Matomo

• Open Source
• Freemium
• Subscription-Based

Glew

• Open Source