mbed TLS vs SharkSSL

Struggling to choose between mbed TLS and SharkSSL? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

mbed TLS is a Security & Privacy solution with tags like cryptography, tls, ssl, embedded-systems.

It boasts features such as TLS/SSL protocol implementation, Cryptographic algorithms and ciphers, X.509 certificate handling, Authentication and encryption, Hardware acceleration support, Lightweight and modular codebase and pros including Free and open source, Compact code and small memory footprint, Highly configurable and customizable, Permissive Apache 2.0 license, Support for a wide range of platforms and architectures, Active development and maintenance.

On the other hand, SharkSSL is a Security & Privacy product tagged with ssl, tls, cryptography, encryption, security, open-source.

Its standout features include Simplified API for SSL/TLS implementation, Modular architecture, Support for client/server models, Support for embedded systems and IoT devices, Implementation of latest TLS protocols and cryptographic algorithms, and it shines with pros like Easier SSL implementation compared to native APIs, Highly configurable and customizable, Lightweight with small code footprint, Open source with community support.

Feature	mbed TLS	SharkSSL
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Security & Privacy	Security & Privacy

Product Overview

mbed TLS

Description: mbed TLS is an open source cryptographic library that provides TLS and SSL capabilities for embedded devices. It is designed to be compact, fast, and flexible enough for both small and large embedded systems.

SharkSSL

Description: SharkSSL is an open source toolkit for SSL/TLS based applications. It provides a simplified API and modular architecture to make SSL implementation easier in client/server models, embedded systems, and IoT devices. It supports the latest TLS protocols and cryptographic algorithms.

Key Features Comparison

mbed TLS Features

• TLS/SSL protocol implementation
• Cryptographic algorithms and ciphers
• X.509 certificate handling
• Authentication and encryption
• Hardware acceleration support
• Lightweight and modular codebase

SharkSSL Features

• Simplified API for SSL/TLS implementation
• Modular architecture
• Support for client/server models
• Support for embedded systems and IoT devices
• Implementation of latest TLS protocols and cryptographic algorithms

Pros & Cons Analysis

mbed TLS

Pros

• Free and open source
• Compact code and small memory footprint
• Highly configurable and customizable
• Permissive Apache 2.0 license
• Support for a wide range of platforms and architectures
• Active development and maintenance

Cons

• Limited native HTTPS server implementation
• Lacks some advanced TLS features
• Not as widely used as OpenSSL
• Requires cryptographic expertise to configure securely
• Limited hardware acceleration support

SharkSSL

Pros

• Easier SSL implementation compared to native APIs
• Highly configurable and customizable
• Lightweight with small code footprint
• Open source with community support

Cons

• Lacks some advanced/enterprise features
• Requires SSL expertise for complex configurations
• Not as widely used as some alternatives like OpenSSL

Pricing Comparison

mbed TLS

• Open Source

SharkSSL

• Open Source