memcached vs Redis

Struggling to choose between memcached and Redis? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

memcached is a Network & Admin solution with tags like caching, memory, performance.

It boasts features such as In-memory key-value store, Distributed architecture, Simple protocol, Horizontal scalability and pros including Very fast data lookup, Reduces database load, Improves overall application performance.

On the other hand, Redis is a Development product tagged with caching, inmemory, keyvalue-store.

Its standout features include In-memory data structure store, Supports various data structures (strings, hashes, lists, sets, sorted sets, bitmaps, hyperloglogs, geospatial indexes, streams), Used as a database, cache, and message broker, Provides high performance and low latency, Supports replication, clustering, and high availability, Supports a wide range of programming languages, Provides a rich set of commands and APIs, Supports data persistence (RDB and AOF), and it shines with pros like High performance and low latency, Flexible and versatile data structures, Supports a wide range of use cases, Easy to set up and configure, Scalable and highly available, Open-source and free to use.

Feature	memcached	Redis
Overall Score	N/A	1
Primary Category	Network & Admin	Development

Product Overview

memcached

Description: Memcached is an open source, high-performance distributed memory object caching system. It is used to speed up dynamic web applications by alleviating database load for reading/writing frequently accessed data.

Redis

Description: Redis is an open-source, in-memory data structure store, used as a database, cache and message broker. It supports data structures such as strings, hashes, lists, sets, sorted sets with range queries, bitmaps, hyperloglogs, geospatial indexes and streams.

Key Features Comparison

memcached Features

• In-memory key-value store
• Distributed architecture
• Simple protocol
• Horizontal scalability

Redis Features

• In-memory data structure store
• Supports various data structures (strings, hashes, lists, sets, sorted sets, bitmaps, hyperloglogs, geospatial indexes, streams)
• Used as a database, cache, and message broker
• Provides high performance and low latency
• Supports replication, clustering, and high availability
• Supports a wide range of programming languages
• Provides a rich set of commands and APIs
• Supports data persistence (RDB and AOF)

Pros & Cons Analysis

memcached

Pros

• Very fast data lookup
• Reduces database load
• Improves overall application performance

Cons

• Data loss on server restart
• Additional system complexity
• Requires application code changes

Redis

Pros

• High performance and low latency
• Flexible and versatile data structures
• Supports a wide range of use cases
• Easy to set up and configure
• Scalable and highly available
• Open-source and free to use

Cons

• In-memory nature can lead to data loss in case of system failures
• Complexity in setting up and maintaining a highly available Redis cluster
• Limited support for transactions and complex queries compared to traditional databases
• Potential for high memory usage, especially for large datasets

Pricing Comparison

memcached

• Open Source

Redis

• Open Source