Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing vs Rapise

Struggling to choose between Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing and Rapise? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing is a Development solution with tags like functional-testing, web-application-testing, mobile-application-testing, test-automation.

It boasts features such as GUI-based test creation, Cross-browser testing, Mobile app testing, API testing, Integrations with CI/CD tools, Scriptless test authoring, Object recognition, Test debugging and pros including Supports multiple protocols and environments, Reusable test components, Headless testing, Parallel test execution, Detailed reporting, Open architecture and extensibility.

On the other hand, Rapise is a Development product tagged with automated-testing, record-and-playback, crossbrowser-testing.

Its standout features include Cross-browser testing, Support for web, mobile, desktop apps, Record and playback to create tests without coding, Object spy to inspect UI elements, Scripting in JavaScript, Python, etc, Integration with CI/CD pipelines, Visual debugging, and it shines with pros like No coding required to create tests, Supports many application types, Powerful scripting capabilities, Good for responsive testing across browsers/devices.

Feature	Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing	Rapise
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing

Description: Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing is a software testing tool used for functional, regression, and performance testing of web and mobile applications. It supports a range of protocols and allows for automated test creation and execution.

Rapise

Description: Rapise is an automated software testing tool that supports cross-browser testing and various application types like web, mobile, desktop, etc. It provides record and playback functionality to easily create tests without coding.

Key Features Comparison

Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing Features

• GUI-based test creation
• Cross-browser testing
• Mobile app testing
• API testing
• Integrations with CI/CD tools
• Scriptless test authoring
• Object recognition
• Test debugging

Rapise Features

• Cross-browser testing
• Support for web, mobile, desktop apps
• Record and playback to create tests without coding
• Object spy to inspect UI elements
• Scripting in JavaScript, Python, etc
• Integration with CI/CD pipelines
• Visual debugging

Pros & Cons Analysis

Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing

Pros

• Supports multiple protocols and environments
• Reusable test components
• Headless testing
• Parallel test execution
• Detailed reporting
• Open architecture and extensibility

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Expensive licensing
• Script maintenance can be challenging
• Limited support for some modern web technologies

Rapise

Pros

• No coding required to create tests
• Supports many application types
• Powerful scripting capabilities
• Good for responsive testing across browsers/devices

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Advanced scripting requires coding knowledge
• Limited community support

Pricing Comparison

Micro Focus Unified Functional Testing

• Subscription-Based
• Pay-As-You-Go

Rapise

• Free
• Subscription-Based