Microsoft Font Validator vs AFDKO

Struggling to choose between Microsoft Font Validator and AFDKO? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Microsoft Font Validator is a Office & Productivity solution with tags like font, validator, testing, quality-assurance, microsoft.

It boasts features such as Scans font files for issues like missing glyphs, corrupt data, and format inconsistencies, Provides detailed reports on font file problems, Supports various font formats including TrueType, OpenType, and WOFF, Allows users to test font files before using them in projects, Helps designers and developers ensure font quality and consistency and pros including Free to use, Comprehensive font file validation, Supports a wide range of font formats, Easy to use interface, Helps identify and fix font-related issues early in the development process.

On the other hand, AFDKO is a Development product tagged with font, opentype, typeface, typography, afdko.

Its standout features include OpenType font development toolkit, Font validation tools, Font hinting tools, Font editing tools, Font testing tools, Command line interface, Cross-platform (Windows, Mac, Linux), and it shines with pros like Free and open source, Powerful font development capabilities, Widely used industry standard, Active community support, Works with major font editors, Supports complex OpenType features.

Feature	Microsoft Font Validator	AFDKO
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Office & Productivity	Development

Product Overview

Microsoft Font Validator

Description: Microsoft Font Validator is a free tool that allows designers and developers to test font files for issues before using them in projects. It scans fonts for problems like missing glyphs, corrupt data, and format inconsistencies.

AFDKO

Description: AFDKO (Adobe Font Development Kit for OpenType) is an open source toolkit for developing complex OpenType fonts. It provides a set of tools, libraries and documentation that allows font developers to create and edit OpenType fonts.

Key Features Comparison

Microsoft Font Validator Features

• Scans font files for issues like missing glyphs, corrupt data, and format inconsistencies
• Provides detailed reports on font file problems
• Supports various font formats including TrueType, OpenType, and WOFF
• Allows users to test font files before using them in projects
• Helps designers and developers ensure font quality and consistency

AFDKO Features

• OpenType font development toolkit
• Font validation tools
• Font hinting tools
• Font editing tools
• Font testing tools
• Command line interface
• Cross-platform (Windows, Mac, Linux)

Pros & Cons Analysis

Microsoft Font Validator

Pros

• Free to use
• Comprehensive font file validation
• Supports a wide range of font formats
• Easy to use interface
• Helps identify and fix font-related issues early in the development process

Cons

• Limited to font file validation only, no other font management features
• May not cover all possible font-related issues
• No advanced features or customization options

AFDKO

Pros

• Free and open source
• Powerful font development capabilities
• Widely used industry standard
• Active community support
• Works with major font editors
• Supports complex OpenType features

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Command line interface not user friendly
• Limited documentation
• Buggy at times
• Difficult to customize and extend

Pricing Comparison

Microsoft Font Validator

• Free

AFDKO

• Open Source