MongoDB vs Hazelcast

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

MongoDB icon
MongoDB
Hazelcast icon
Hazelcast

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between MongoDB and Hazelcast? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

MongoDB is a Development solution with tags like nosql, document-database, open-source.

It boasts features such as Document-oriented storage, Automatic sharding, Rich and expressive query language, High availability, Horizontal scalability and pros including Flexible schema, High performance, Easy scalability, Rich query capabilities, High availability.

On the other hand, Hazelcast is a Development product tagged with caching, processing-streams, clustering.

Its standout features include Distributed in-memory data store, Low latency data access, Automatic sharding and rebalancing, ACID transactions, Querying and aggregation, Event journaling, Multi-datacenter replication, Web session clustering, Continuous query, Machine learning, and it shines with pros like Fast performance, Easy scalability, High availability, Flexible deployment options, Open source, Rich ecosystem.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare MongoDB and Hazelcast?

When evaluating MongoDB versus Hazelcast, both solutions serve different needs within the development ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

MongoDB and Hazelcast have established themselves in the development market. Key areas include nosql, document-database, open-source.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between MongoDB and Hazelcast significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include nosql, document-database, open-source.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include nosql, document-database and caching, processing-streams.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between MongoDB and Hazelcast. You might also explore nosql, document-database, open-source for alternative approaches.

Feature MongoDB Hazelcast
Overall Score 1 N/A
Primary Category Development Development
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

MongoDB
MongoDB

Description: MongoDB is a popular open-source, document-oriented NoSQL database. It stores data in flexible, JSON-like documents, rather than rows and columns used in traditional RDBMS. MongoDB is scalable, high-performance and easy to use.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

Hazelcast
Hazelcast

Description: Hazelcast is an open source in-memory data grid that enables distribution of data and computation across servers for scalability, speed, and resilience. It is commonly used for caching, processing streams, and clustering.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

MongoDB
MongoDB Features
  • Document-oriented storage
  • Automatic sharding
  • Rich and expressive query language
  • High availability
  • Horizontal scalability
Hazelcast
Hazelcast Features
  • Distributed in-memory data store
  • Low latency data access
  • Automatic sharding and rebalancing
  • ACID transactions
  • Querying and aggregation
  • Event journaling
  • Multi-datacenter replication
  • Web session clustering
  • Continuous query
  • Machine learning

Pros & Cons Analysis

MongoDB
MongoDB
Pros
  • Flexible schema
  • High performance
  • Easy scalability
  • Rich query capabilities
  • High availability
Cons
  • No transactions
  • No joins
  • Limited query flexibility compared to SQL
  • Steep learning curve
Hazelcast
Hazelcast
Pros
  • Fast performance
  • Easy scalability
  • High availability
  • Flexible deployment options
  • Open source
  • Rich ecosystem
Cons
  • Complex configuration
  • Steep learning curve
  • No visual interface

Pricing Comparison

MongoDB
MongoDB
  • Open Source
  • Subscription-Based
Hazelcast
Hazelcast
  • Open Source
  • Enterprise Edition (Subscription)

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs