Nebula Container Orchestrator vs Stackato

Struggling to choose between Nebula Container Orchestrator and Stackato? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Nebula Container Orchestrator is a Network & Admin solution with tags like container, orchestration, deployment, scaling, management, opensource.

It boasts features such as Self-hosted container orchestration, Supports Docker and containerd runtimes, Built-in service discovery, Rolling updates, Health checks, Resource quotas, Access control policies, CLI and GUI and pros including Lightweight and portable, Open source and free, Easy to install, Good for small deployments, Extensible and customizable.

On the other hand, Stackato is a Development product tagged with cloud, paas, devops.

Its standout features include Supports multiple languages and frameworks like Python, Ruby, Node.js, Java, PHP, etc., Built-in services like caching, messaging, databases, monitoring, logging, etc., Auto-scaling and load balancing of applications, Single sign-on and access control for security, CLI and UI for application management and monitoring, Integrated with Docker for containerization, and it shines with pros like Fast and easy deployment of cloud applications, Reduces time to market for applications, Flexible scaling of resources, High availability and reliability, Cost efficient compared to IaaS solutions, DevOps friendly environment.

Feature	Nebula Container Orchestrator	Stackato
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Network & Admin	Development

Product Overview

Nebula Container Orchestrator

Description: Nebula Container Orchestrator is an open-source container orchestration platform that can automate deployment, scaling and management of containerized services. It is designed to be lightweight, portable and extensible.

Stackato

Description: Stackato is a platform-as-a-service (PaaS) solution created by ActiveState for deploying and managing applications in the cloud. It provides an open platform to build, deploy, and scale apps in multiple languages using various frameworks.

Key Features Comparison

Nebula Container Orchestrator Features

• Self-hosted container orchestration
• Supports Docker and containerd runtimes
• Built-in service discovery
• Rolling updates
• Health checks
• Resource quotas
• Access control policies
• CLI and GUI

Stackato Features

• Supports multiple languages and frameworks like Python, Ruby, Node.js, Java, PHP, etc.
• Built-in services like caching, messaging, databases, monitoring, logging, etc.
• Auto-scaling and load balancing of applications
• Single sign-on and access control for security
• CLI and UI for application management and monitoring
• Integrated with Docker for containerization

Pros & Cons Analysis

Nebula Container Orchestrator

Pros

• Lightweight and portable
• Open source and free
• Easy to install
• Good for small deployments
• Extensible and customizable

Cons

• Limited adoption and community
• Less features than Kubernetes
• Not ideal for large deployments
• Lacks some advanced orchestration features

Stackato

Pros

• Fast and easy deployment of cloud applications
• Reduces time to market for applications
• Flexible scaling of resources
• High availability and reliability
• Cost efficient compared to IaaS solutions
• DevOps friendly environment

Cons

• Can be complex for beginners
• Limited customization compared to IaaS
• Requires re-architecting monolithic apps
• Vendor lock-in
• Additional costs for extra services and features

Pricing Comparison

Nebula Container Orchestrator

• Open Source
• Free

Stackato

• Free
• Subscription-Based