Skip to content

noVNC vs PuTTY

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs.

noVNC icon
noVNC
PuTTY icon
PuTTY

noVNC vs PuTTY: The Verdict

Last updated: May 2026 · Comparison by Sugggest Editorial Team

Feature noVNC PuTTY
Sugggest Score — —
Category Remote Work & Education Network & Admin
Pricing Open Source Open Source

Product Overview

noVNC
noVNC

Description: noVNC is an open source VNC client that allows users to access GUI desktops remotely through a web browser. It does not require browser plugins or client software installation.

Type: software

Pricing: Open Source

PuTTY
PuTTY

Description: PuTTY is a popular open-source terminal emulator and SSH client for Windows. Developed by Simon Tatham, PuTTY provides a lightweight and versatile tool for connecting to remote servers using various network protocols, including SSH, Telnet, and Rlogin. It is widely used for secure and convenient command-line access to remote systems.

Type: software

Pricing: Open Source

Key Features Comparison

noVNC
noVNC Features
  • Browser-based remote desktop client
  • Supports VNC connections
  • Open source JavaScript implementation
  • Works with HTML5 compliant browsers
  • Supports mouse, keyboard input
  • Audio support
  • File transfers
  • TLS encryption
PuTTY
PuTTY Features
  • SSH client
  • Telnet client
  • Rlogin client
  • Raw socket connection
  • Serial port connection
  • Basic file transfer (SCP and SFTP)
  • Proxying for tunneling connections through HTTP proxies
  • Local terminal emulator (with VT100 and VT52 emulation)
  • Configurable keyboard shortcuts
  • Session logging

Pros & Cons Analysis

noVNC
noVNC
Pros
  • Easy to set up and use
  • Cross-platform and browser support
  • No browser plugins required
  • Open source with active development
  • Supports latest web technologies
Cons
  • Lower performance than native VNC clients
  • Limited to VNC protocol
  • Audio support can be spotty
  • File transfers can be slow
PuTTY
PuTTY
Pros
  • Free and open source
  • Lightweight and fast
  • Supports multiple network protocols
  • Available for Windows, with unofficial ports for other platforms
  • Highly configurable with many options
  • Actively developed and maintained
Cons
  • Official builds only for Windows
  • Limited file transfer capabilities compared to FTP/SFTP clients
  • Minimalist interface lacks some conveniences of other SSH clients
  • Lacks advanced SSH features like agent forwarding or port tunneling
  • No official support offered

Pricing Comparison

noVNC
noVNC
  • Open Source
PuTTY
PuTTY
  • Open Source

Related Comparisons

Remmina
vs noVNC vs PuTTY
MobaXterm
vs noVNC vs PuTTY
TeamViewer
vs noVNC vs PuTTY
SecureCRT
vs noVNC vs PuTTY
UltraVNC
vs noVNC vs PuTTY
Apache Guacamole
vs noVNC vs PuTTY

Learn More About Each Product

noVNC
noVNC
Reviews, pricing & alternatives →
PuTTY
PuTTY
Reviews, pricing & alternatives →

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs

noVNC Alternatives
PuTTY Alternatives
Browse More Software