Open Web Analytics vs Wikidata

Struggling to choose between Open Web Analytics and Wikidata? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Open Web Analytics is a Business & Commerce solution with tags like open-source, web-analytics, traffic-tracking, usage-analytics.

It boasts features such as Open source web analytics software, Easy to install and configure, Tracks website visitors and traffic sources, Provides reports on visits, page views, referrers, search keywords, Customizable dashboards and reporting, Event and goal tracking, Support for A/B testing, API for data export and integration, Works with MySQL, PostgreSQL and MS SQL databases and pros including Free and open source, Easy to set up and use, Provides core web analytics functionality, Customizable and extensible, Self-hosted - you control your data, Active development community.

On the other hand, Wikidata is a Online Services product tagged with knowledge-base, structured-data, wikimedia, wikipedia.

Its standout features include Centralized storage of structured data, Supports 300+ languages, Open data that anyone can edit, Query interface to access data, API access to data, Linked open data integrated with other databases, Used by Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects, and it shines with pros like Free and open access, Community-driven data curation, Multilingual support, Extensive structured knowledge base, Frequent updates and additions, Linked open data increases utility, Wide adoption by major websites.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Open Web Analytics

Open Web Analytics

Open Web Analytics (OWA) is an open source web analytics software that allows you to track and analyze traffic on your website. It is designed to be easy to install and use, while providing detailed analytics reports.

Categories:
open-source web-analytics traffic-tracking usage-analytics

Open Web Analytics Features

  1. Open source web analytics software
  2. Easy to install and configure
  3. Tracks website visitors and traffic sources
  4. Provides reports on visits, page views, referrers, search keywords
  5. Customizable dashboards and reporting
  6. Event and goal tracking
  7. Support for A/B testing
  8. API for data export and integration
  9. Works with MySQL, PostgreSQL and MS SQL databases

Pricing

  • Open Source

Pros

Free and open source

Easy to set up and use

Provides core web analytics functionality

Customizable and extensible

Self-hosted - you control your data

Active development community

Cons

Less features than commercial solutions

Requires technical expertise to install and manage

Limited support options

Not as user friendly as some tools

Potential security risks if not updated regularly


Wikidata

Wikidata

Wikidata is a free and open knowledge base that can be read and edited by both humans and machines. It acts as central storage for the structured data of its Wikimedia sister projects including Wikipedia, Wikivoyage, Wiktionary, Wikisource, and others.

Categories:
knowledge-base structured-data wikimedia wikipedia

Wikidata Features

  1. Centralized storage of structured data
  2. Supports 300+ languages
  3. Open data that anyone can edit
  4. Query interface to access data
  5. API access to data
  6. Linked open data integrated with other databases
  7. Used by Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects

Pricing

  • Open Source
  • Free

Pros

Free and open access

Community-driven data curation

Multilingual support

Extensive structured knowledge base

Frequent updates and additions

Linked open data increases utility

Wide adoption by major websites

Cons

Data quality dependent on contributors

Complex structure has learning curve

Limited tools for analysis compared to databases

Less features than commercial knowledge bases

Some incorrect or incomplete data

Biases possible from community editing model