PandaBoard vs Radxa Rock

Struggling to choose between PandaBoard and Radxa Rock? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

PandaBoard is a System & Hardware solution with tags like arm, omap4430, android, ubuntu, linux.

It boasts features such as Low-cost open-source single-board computer, Based on OMAP4430 system-on-a-chip, Dual-core 1GHz ARM Cortex-A9 CPU, 1GB RAM, Runs Android, Ubuntu and other Linux distributions and pros including Inexpensive, Open source design allows customization, Supports various operating systems.

On the other hand, Radxa Rock is a System & Hardware product tagged with arm, rockchip, rk3328, quadcore, cortexa53, embedded-computing.

Its standout features include Quad-core ARM Cortex-A53 processor, Mali-450 MP2 GPU, 1GB or 2GB DDR3 RAM, 8GB or 16GB eMMC flash storage, Gigabit Ethernet, 40-pin GPIO header, MIPI DSI and CSI interfaces, and it shines with pros like Low cost, Good performance for the price, Community support, Wide range of I/O options.

Feature	PandaBoard	Radxa Rock
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	System & Hardware	System & Hardware

Product Overview

PandaBoard

Description: PandaBoard is an low-cost, open-source single-board computer based on the OMAP4430 system-on-a-chip. It features a dual-core 1GHz ARM Cortex-A9 CPU, 1GB of RAM, and runs Android, Ubuntu, and other Linux distributions.

Radxa Rock

Description: Radxa Rock is a small, low-cost single-board computer that runs on a Rockchip RK3328 quad-core ARM Cortex-A53 processor. It is designed for high performance embedded computing projects.

Key Features Comparison

PandaBoard Features

• Low-cost open-source single-board computer
• Based on OMAP4430 system-on-a-chip
• Dual-core 1GHz ARM Cortex-A9 CPU
• 1GB RAM
• Runs Android, Ubuntu and other Linux distributions

Radxa Rock Features

• Quad-core ARM Cortex-A53 processor
• Mali-450 MP2 GPU
• 1GB or 2GB DDR3 RAM
• 8GB or 16GB eMMC flash storage
• Gigabit Ethernet
• 40-pin GPIO header
• MIPI DSI and CSI interfaces

Pros & Cons Analysis

PandaBoard

Pros

• Inexpensive
• Open source design allows customization
• Supports various operating systems

Cons

• Limited processing power compared to newer boards
• May require technical expertise to set up and configure

Radxa Rock

Pros

• Low cost
• Good performance for the price
• Community support
• Wide range of I/O options

Cons

• Limited RAM and storage options
• No built-in wireless connectivity
• Lacks some features found on more expensive boards

Pricing Comparison

PandaBoard

• Open Source

Radxa Rock

• One-time Purchase