Pedestal vs Play Framework

Struggling to choose between Pedestal and Play Framework? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Pedestal is a Development solution with tags like lisp, cms, websites, open-source.

It boasts features such as Lightweight and fast, Built on Common Lisp, Extensible and customizable, Template engine for theming, Role-based access control, WYSIWYG editor, Media management, Multi-lingual support and pros including Very flexible and extensible, Good performance, Open source with active community, Easy to customize design and functionality.

On the other hand, Play Framework is a Development product tagged with scala, java, mvc.

Its standout features include Built on Akka, it provides asynchronous and non-blocking I/O, Uses convention over configuration, Supports rapid application development, Integrated with Scala and Java, and it shines with pros like High performance, Increased developer productivity, Easy to scale, Open source with large community.

Feature	Pedestal	Play Framework
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Pedestal

Description: Pedestal is an open-source content management system (CMS) built using the Lisp programming language. It is designed to be lightweight, flexible, and extensible. Pedestal allows users to easily create and manage websites and web content.

Play Framework

Description: The Play Framework is an open-source web application framework that follows the model–view–controller architectural pattern. It is written in Scala and Java and allows rapid application development by using convention over configuration, hot code reloading and display of compilation errors in the browser.

Key Features Comparison

Pedestal Features

• Lightweight and fast
• Built on Common Lisp
• Extensible and customizable
• Template engine for theming
• Role-based access control
• WYSIWYG editor
• Media management
• Multi-lingual support

Play Framework Features

• Built on Akka, it provides asynchronous and non-blocking I/O
• Uses convention over configuration
• Supports rapid application development
• Integrated with Scala and Java

Pros & Cons Analysis

Pedestal

Pros

• Very flexible and extensible
• Good performance
• Open source with active community
• Easy to customize design and functionality

Cons

• Steep learning curve for non-Lisp developers
• Limited built-in features compared to other CMSs
• Not as widely used as other options

Play Framework

Pros

• High performance
• Increased developer productivity
• Easy to scale
• Open source with large community

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Not suitable for complex applications
• Not many third party libraries
• Limited documentation

Pricing Comparison

Pedestal

• Open Source

Play Framework

• Open Source