Phaser vs FlatRedBall

Struggling to choose between Phaser and FlatRedBall? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Phaser is a Games solution with tags like html5, javascript, game-engine, 2d-games.

It boasts features such as WebGL and Canvas rendering, Built-in physics engine, Asset loading, Input handling, Cameras, Particles, Time-stepped updates, Scenes and transitions and pros including Open source, Good documentation, Large community, Active development, Permissive license, Good performance.

On the other hand, FlatRedBall is a Games product tagged with 2d, game-engine, open-source, crossplatform, editor.

Its standout features include 2D game engine and editor, Cross-platform game development, Handles graphics, audio, input, physics, and more, Open source, Designed for easy 2D game creation, and it shines with pros like Open source and free to use, Supports cross-platform development, Provides a wide range of built-in features, Active community and documentation.

Feature	Phaser	FlatRedBall
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Games	Games

Product Overview

Phaser

Description: Phaser is a fast, free, and fun open source HTML5 game framework. It offers WebGL and Canvas rendering across desktop and mobile web browsers. Phaser is ideal for making 2D games like platformers, top-down shooters, puzzle games, and more.

FlatRedBall

Description: FlatRedBall is an open source 2D game engine and editor. It is designed for easily creating 2D games that can run cross-platform on multiple devices. The engine handles graphics, audio, input, physics, and more out of the box.

Key Features Comparison

Phaser Features

• WebGL and Canvas rendering
• Built-in physics engine
• Asset loading
• Input handling
• Cameras
• Particles
• Time-stepped updates
• Scenes and transitions

FlatRedBall Features

• 2D game engine and editor
• Cross-platform game development
• Handles graphics, audio, input, physics, and more
• Open source
• Designed for easy 2D game creation

Pros & Cons Analysis

Phaser

Pros

• Open source
• Good documentation
• Large community
• Active development
• Permissive license
• Good performance

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Not ideal for complex 3D games
• Limited UI components
• No built-in networking

FlatRedBall

Pros

• Open source and free to use
• Supports cross-platform development
• Provides a wide range of built-in features
• Active community and documentation

Cons

• Primarily focused on 2D games
• May have a steeper learning curve for beginners
• Limited support for advanced 3D features

Pricing Comparison

Phaser

• Open Source

FlatRedBall

• Open Source