Skip to content

phpIPAM vs PuTTY

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs.

phpIPAM icon
phpIPAM
PuTTY icon
PuTTY

phpIPAM vs PuTTY: The Verdict

Last updated: May 2026 · Comparison by Sugggest Editorial Team

Feature phpIPAM PuTTY
Sugggest Score — —
Category Network & Admin Network & Admin
Pricing Open Source Open Source

Product Overview

phpIPAM
phpIPAM

Description: phpIPAM is an open-source IP address management application. It allows administrators to manage IPv4 and IPv6 addresses, subnets, VLANs, and other network objects through a web interface. Useful for mid-size networks.

Type: software

Pricing: Open Source

PuTTY
PuTTY

Description: PuTTY is a popular open-source terminal emulator and SSH client for Windows. Developed by Simon Tatham, PuTTY provides a lightweight and versatile tool for connecting to remote servers using various network protocols, including SSH, Telnet, and Rlogin. It is widely used for secure and convenient command-line access to remote systems.

Type: software

Pricing: Open Source

Key Features Comparison

phpIPAM
phpIPAM Features
  • IP address management
  • Subnet management
  • VLAN management
  • DHCP server management
  • DNS server management
  • User and group management
  • REST API
PuTTY
PuTTY Features
  • SSH client
  • Telnet client
  • Rlogin client
  • Raw socket connection
  • Serial port connection
  • Basic file transfer (SCP and SFTP)
  • Proxying for tunneling connections through HTTP proxies
  • Local terminal emulator (with VT100 and VT52 emulation)
  • Configurable keyboard shortcuts
  • Session logging

Pros & Cons Analysis

phpIPAM
phpIPAM
Pros
  • Open source
  • Easy to use web interface
  • Scales to mid-size networks
  • Integrates with LDAP/AD
  • REST API for automation
Cons
  • Lacks some features of commercial IPAM tools
  • Can be complex for very large networks
  • Limited native integrations
PuTTY
PuTTY
Pros
  • Free and open source
  • Lightweight and fast
  • Supports multiple network protocols
  • Available for Windows, with unofficial ports for other platforms
  • Highly configurable with many options
  • Actively developed and maintained
Cons
  • Official builds only for Windows
  • Limited file transfer capabilities compared to FTP/SFTP clients
  • Minimalist interface lacks some conveniences of other SSH clients
  • Lacks advanced SSH features like agent forwarding or port tunneling
  • No official support offered

Pricing Comparison

phpIPAM
phpIPAM
  • Open Source
PuTTY
PuTTY
  • Open Source

Related Comparisons

MobaXterm
vs phpIPAM vs PuTTY
SecureCRT
vs phpIPAM vs PuTTY
OpenNetAdmin
vs phpIPAM vs PuTTY
SolarWinds IP Address Manager
vs phpIPAM vs PuTTY
Ubersmith
vs phpIPAM vs PuTTY

Learn More About Each Product

phpIPAM
phpIPAM
Reviews, pricing & alternatives →
PuTTY
PuTTY
Reviews, pricing & alternatives →

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs

phpIPAM Alternatives
PuTTY Alternatives
Browse More Software