Polipo vs Artica Proxy

Struggling to choose between Polipo and Artica Proxy? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Polipo is a Network & Admin solution with tags like caching, web-proxy, bandwidth-saving.

It boasts features such as HTTP proxy, Caching web proxy, Supports HTTP/1.0 and HTTP/1.1, Disk and memory caching, Efficient cache storage, Configuration via text file, Supports SOCKS proxy chaining and pros including Fast and lightweight, Improves browsing speed, Saves bandwidth, Easy to setup and configure, Actively maintained, Runs on multiple platforms.

On the other hand, Artica Proxy is a Network & Admin product tagged with proxy, web-proxy, caching, content-filtering, bandwidth-management.

Its standout features include Web proxy and cache, Bandwidth management, Content filtering, Antivirus scanning, SSL inspection, Load balancing, Access control, and it shines with pros like Open source and free, Easy to install and configure, Provides web caching for faster speeds, Has bandwidth management for traffic shaping, Can filter web content and block sites, Includes antivirus scanning for malware, Supports SSL inspection for HTTPS traffic, Load balancing and high availability features, Granular access controls and authentication.

Feature	Polipo	Artica Proxy
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Network & Admin	Network & Admin

Product Overview

Polipo

Description: Polipo is a small and fast caching web proxy. It is designed to be used by one person or a small group of people. It caches websites, images, videos and other content to improve browsing speed and save bandwidth.

Artica Proxy

Description: Artica Proxy is an open-source proxy server and web filtering software. It provides caching, content filtering, bandwidth management, and more for networks. Artica is designed to be easy to install and configure.

Key Features Comparison

Polipo Features

• HTTP proxy
• Caching web proxy
• Supports HTTP/1.0 and HTTP/1.1
• Disk and memory caching
• Efficient cache storage
• Configuration via text file
• Supports SOCKS proxy chaining

Artica Proxy Features

• Web proxy and cache
• Bandwidth management
• Content filtering
• Antivirus scanning
• SSL inspection
• Load balancing
• Access control

Pros & Cons Analysis

Polipo

Pros

• Fast and lightweight
• Improves browsing speed
• Saves bandwidth
• Easy to setup and configure
• Actively maintained
• Runs on multiple platforms

Cons

• No web-based interface
• Limited configuration options
• Not designed for large groups
• No access control or authentication

Artica Proxy

Pros

• Open source and free
• Easy to install and configure
• Provides web caching for faster speeds
• Has bandwidth management for traffic shaping
• Can filter web content and block sites
• Includes antivirus scanning for malware
• Supports SSL inspection for HTTPS traffic
• Load balancing and high availability features
• Granular access controls and authentication

Cons

• Lacks some advanced enterprise features
• Configuration can be complex for advanced setups
• Requires manual updates and maintenance
• Limited native reporting capabilities
• Not optimized for very large deployments
• Requires technical expertise to manage and support

Pricing Comparison

Polipo

• Open Source

Artica Proxy

• Open Source