Polybrush vs 3D-Coat

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

Polybrush icon
Polybrush
3D-Coat icon
3D-Coat

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between Polybrush and 3D-Coat? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Polybrush is a Development solution with tags like 3d, texturing, unity.

It boasts features such as Paint textures and materials directly onto 3D models, Intuitive brush interface for quickly texturing assets, Supports multiple brushes like round, square, texture projection, Layers system to manage and blend textures, Supports vertex colors, terrain textures and lightmap UVs, Works with both hard surface and organic models, Real-time feedback while painting, Undo system to revert mistakes, Export/import textures to apply across multiple models and pros including Very easy to use, Saves time texturing models vs traditional UV workflow, Great for quickly prototyping levels and testing ideas, Allows non-artists to texture models without deep technical knowledge.

On the other hand, 3D-Coat is a Photos & Graphics product tagged with 3d, modeling, sculpting, concept-art, animation, voxel.

Its standout features include Voxel-based modeling, Sculpting brushes, UV mapping tools, Retopology tools, PBR rendering, Texture painting, Animation tools, and it shines with pros like Intuitive voxel workflow, Powerful sculpting and detailing, Great for organic and hard surface modeling, Specialized UV unwrapping tools, Can export high resolution models for games and film.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare Polybrush and 3D-Coat?

When evaluating Polybrush versus 3D-Coat, both solutions serve different needs within the development ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

Polybrush and 3D-Coat have established themselves in the development market. Key areas include 3d, texturing, unity.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between Polybrush and 3D-Coat significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include 3d, texturing, unity.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include 3d, texturing and 3d, modeling.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between Polybrush and 3D-Coat. You might also explore 3d, texturing, unity for alternative approaches.

Feature Polybrush 3D-Coat
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Development Photos & Graphics
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

Polybrush
Polybrush

Description: Polybrush is a Unity plugin that allows you to paint textures and materials onto 3D models within the Unity editor. It provides an intuitive brush and palette interface for quickly texturing assets.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

3D-Coat
3D-Coat

Description: 3D-Coat is a digital sculpting program focused on concept art and high-resolution models for games, film, and animation. It features a unique voxel-based workflow and specialized tools for UV unwrapping, dynamic topology, and hard surface modeling.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

Polybrush
Polybrush Features
  • Paint textures and materials directly onto 3D models
  • Intuitive brush interface for quickly texturing assets
  • Supports multiple brushes like round, square, texture projection
  • Layers system to manage and blend textures
  • Supports vertex colors, terrain textures and lightmap UVs
  • Works with both hard surface and organic models
  • Real-time feedback while painting
  • Undo system to revert mistakes
  • Export/import textures to apply across multiple models
3D-Coat
3D-Coat Features
  • Voxel-based modeling
  • Sculpting brushes
  • UV mapping tools
  • Retopology tools
  • PBR rendering
  • Texture painting
  • Animation tools

Pros & Cons Analysis

Polybrush
Polybrush
Pros
  • Very easy to use
  • Saves time texturing models vs traditional UV workflow
  • Great for quickly prototyping levels and testing ideas
  • Allows non-artists to texture models without deep technical knowledge
Cons
  • Less control than full UV unwrapping workflow
  • Can be harder to achieve complex multi-material textures
  • Requires compute shader support (Unity 2018+)
3D-Coat
3D-Coat
Pros
  • Intuitive voxel workflow
  • Powerful sculpting and detailing
  • Great for organic and hard surface modeling
  • Specialized UV unwrapping tools
  • Can export high resolution models for games and film
Cons
  • Steep learning curve
  • Not as widely used as ZBrush or Blender
  • Limited animation and rigging tools

Pricing Comparison

Polybrush
Polybrush
  • Free
3D-Coat
3D-Coat
  • One-time Purchase
  • Subscription-Based

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs