PSI:Capture vs Hyland OnBase

Professional comparison and analysis to help you choose the right software solution for your needs. Compare features, pricing, pros & cons, and make an informed decision.

PSI:Capture icon
PSI:Capture
Hyland OnBase icon
Hyland OnBase

Expert Analysis & Comparison

Struggling to choose between PSI:Capture and Hyland OnBase? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

PSI:Capture is a Business & Commerce solution with tags like user-testing, session-recording, user-behavior-analysis.

It boasts features such as Session recordings, Heatmaps, Form analytics, Funnel analysis, Survey distribution, Session tagging, Customizable test plans and pros including Detailed user session recordings, Heatmaps show user attention, Integrates with popular tools, Good for improving UX.

On the other hand, Hyland OnBase is a Business & Commerce product tagged with document-management, workflow-automation, content-management.

Its standout features include Document management, Workflow automation, Capture, Storage, Retrieval, Security, Integration, Reporting, and it shines with pros like Intuitive interface, Flexible workflows, Robust permissions, Integrates with other apps, Scalable.

To help you make an informed decision, we've compiled a comprehensive comparison of these two products, delving into their features, pros, cons, pricing, and more. Get ready to explore the nuances that set them apart and determine which one is the perfect fit for your requirements.

Why Compare PSI:Capture and Hyland OnBase?

When evaluating PSI:Capture versus Hyland OnBase, both solutions serve different needs within the business & commerce ecosystem. This comparison helps determine which solution aligns with your specific requirements and technical approach.

Market Position & Industry Recognition

PSI:Capture and Hyland OnBase have established themselves in the business & commerce market. Key areas include user-testing, session-recording, user-behavior-analysis.

Technical Architecture & Implementation

The architectural differences between PSI:Capture and Hyland OnBase significantly impact implementation and maintenance approaches. Related technologies include user-testing, session-recording, user-behavior-analysis.

Integration & Ecosystem

Both solutions integrate with various tools and platforms. Common integration points include user-testing, session-recording and document-management, workflow-automation.

Decision Framework

Consider your technical requirements, team expertise, and integration needs when choosing between PSI:Capture and Hyland OnBase. You might also explore user-testing, session-recording, user-behavior-analysis for alternative approaches.

Feature PSI:Capture Hyland OnBase
Overall Score N/A N/A
Primary Category Business & Commerce Business & Commerce
Target Users Developers, QA Engineers QA Teams, Non-technical Users
Deployment Self-hosted, Cloud Cloud-based, SaaS
Learning Curve Moderate to Steep Easy to Moderate

Product Overview

PSI:Capture
PSI:Capture

Description: PSI:Capture is a user testing software that allows you to easily record user sessions on your website or application. It captures user interactions like mouse movements, clicks, scrolls, and onscreen activity so you can see exactly how users navigate and experience your site.

Type: Open Source Test Automation Framework

Founded: 2011

Primary Use: Mobile app testing automation

Supported Platforms: iOS, Android, Windows

Hyland OnBase
Hyland OnBase

Description: Hyland OnBase is a document management and workflow automation software used to capture, store, manage, and deliver content across an organization. It helps organizations eliminate paper and automate business processes.

Type: Cloud-based Test Automation Platform

Founded: 2015

Primary Use: Web, mobile, and API testing

Supported Platforms: Web, iOS, Android, API

Key Features Comparison

PSI:Capture
PSI:Capture Features
  • Session recordings
  • Heatmaps
  • Form analytics
  • Funnel analysis
  • Survey distribution
  • Session tagging
  • Customizable test plans
Hyland OnBase
Hyland OnBase Features
  • Document management
  • Workflow automation
  • Capture
  • Storage
  • Retrieval
  • Security
  • Integration
  • Reporting

Pros & Cons Analysis

PSI:Capture
PSI:Capture
Pros
  • Detailed user session recordings
  • Heatmaps show user attention
  • Integrates with popular tools
  • Good for improving UX
Cons
  • Can get expensive for large teams
  • Setup requires some technical expertise
  • Limited mobile app support
Hyland OnBase
Hyland OnBase
Pros
  • Intuitive interface
  • Flexible workflows
  • Robust permissions
  • Integrates with other apps
  • Scalable
Cons
  • Expensive
  • Steep learning curve
  • Customization can be complex
  • Dependence on consultants for implementation

Pricing Comparison

PSI:Capture
PSI:Capture
  • Subscription-Based
Hyland OnBase
Hyland OnBase
  • Subscription-Based
  • Custom Pricing

Get More Information

Ready to Make Your Decision?

Explore more software comparisons and find the perfect solution for your needs