Puppet vs Cfengine

Struggling to choose between Puppet and Cfengine? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Puppet is a Network & Admin solution with tags like configuration-management, automation, infrastructure-automation.

It boasts features such as Configuration Management, Infrastructure Automation, Continuous Delivery and pros including Powerful DSL for infrastructure automation, Large ecosystem of modules and plugins, Agentless architecture, Cross-platform support.

On the other hand, Cfengine is a Network & Admin product tagged with automation, configuration-management, devops.

Its standout features include Agent-based architecture for distributed configuration management, Declarative policy-based configuration language, File integrity monitoring and intrusion detection, Automated system configuration and maintenance, Built-in promise theory for modeling dependencies, Support for common OS platforms like Linux, Windows, Solaris, and it shines with pros like Powerful policy framework for modeling system state, Agentless and autonomous operation, Efficient at scale for large server deployments, Robust security and access controls, Thorough file integrity monitoring capabilities, Open source with active development community.

Feature	Puppet	Cfengine
Overall Score	1	N/A
Primary Category	Network & Admin	Network & Admin

Product Overview

Puppet

Description: Puppet is an open source configuration management and automation tool. It helps system administrators manage IT infrastructure by automating repetitive tasks, enforcing desired state configuration, and increasing efficiency.

Cfengine

Description: Cfengine is an open source configuration management software used to automate tasks like configuring servers, managing files, and deploying applications. It uses a policy-based approach allowing admins to define desired system states.

Key Features Comparison

Puppet Features

• Configuration Management
• Infrastructure Automation
• Continuous Delivery

Cfengine Features

• Agent-based architecture for distributed configuration management
• Declarative policy-based configuration language
• File integrity monitoring and intrusion detection
• Automated system configuration and maintenance
• Built-in promise theory for modeling dependencies
• Support for common OS platforms like Linux, Windows, Solaris

Pros & Cons Analysis

Puppet

Pros

• Powerful DSL for infrastructure automation
• Large ecosystem of modules and plugins
• Agentless architecture
• Cross-platform support

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Can be complex to set up and manage
• Limited UI and reporting capabilities
• Not ideal for small environments

Cfengine

Pros

• Powerful policy framework for modeling system state
• Agentless and autonomous operation
• Efficient at scale for large server deployments
• Robust security and access controls
• Thorough file integrity monitoring capabilities
• Open source with active development community

Cons

• Steep learning curve for policy language
• Less intuitive than procedural languages like Ansible
• Limited built-in modules compared to Ansible/Puppet
• Complex dependency modeling requires planning
• Not as widely used as other tools like Chef/Puppet

Pricing Comparison

Puppet

• Open Source
• Commercial License

Cfengine

• Open Source
• Commercial Editions Available