PuTTY vs Blink Shell

Struggling to choose between PuTTY and Blink Shell? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

PuTTY is a Network & Admin solution with tags like terminal-emulator, ssh-client, remote-access, command-line.

It boasts features such as SSH client, Telnet client, Rlogin client, Raw socket connection, Serial port connection, Basic file transfer (SCP and SFTP), Proxying for tunneling connections through HTTP proxies, Local terminal emulator (with VT100 and VT52 emulation), Configurable keyboard shortcuts, Session logging and pros including Free and open source, Lightweight and fast, Supports multiple network protocols, Available for Windows, with unofficial ports for other platforms, Highly configurable with many options, Actively developed and maintained.

On the other hand, Blink Shell is a Network & Admin product tagged with ssh, terminal, cli, mosh, remote-access.

Its standout features include SSH client for mobile devices, Connect to remote servers over SSH, Use command line interface on mobile, Public key authentication, Keyboard shortcuts, Themes and colors, Mosh support, and it shines with pros like Access servers from mobile device, Secure SSH connections, Familiar command line interface, Keyboard shortcuts for efficiency, Customizable with themes, Mosh improves remote shell experience.

Feature	PuTTY	Blink Shell
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Network & Admin	Network & Admin

Product Overview

PuTTY

Description: PuTTY is a popular open-source terminal emulator and SSH client for Windows. Developed by Simon Tatham, PuTTY provides a lightweight and versatile tool for connecting to remote servers using various network protocols, including SSH, Telnet, and Rlogin. It is widely used for secure and convenient command-line access to remote systems.

Blink Shell

Description: Blink Shell is a mobile SSH client for iOS and Android. It allows you to securely connect to Linux or Unix servers via SSH and use the command-line interface. Key features include public key authentication, themes and colors, keyboard shortcuts, and Mosh support.

Key Features Comparison

PuTTY Features

• SSH client
• Telnet client
• Rlogin client
• Raw socket connection
• Serial port connection
• Basic file transfer (SCP and SFTP)
• Proxying for tunneling connections through HTTP proxies
• Local terminal emulator (with VT100 and VT52 emulation)
• Configurable keyboard shortcuts
• Session logging

Blink Shell Features

• SSH client for mobile devices
• Connect to remote servers over SSH
• Use command line interface on mobile
• Public key authentication
• Keyboard shortcuts
• Themes and colors
• Mosh support

Pros & Cons Analysis

PuTTY

Pros

• Free and open source
• Lightweight and fast
• Supports multiple network protocols
• Available for Windows, with unofficial ports for other platforms
• Highly configurable with many options
• Actively developed and maintained

Cons

• Official builds only for Windows
• Limited file transfer capabilities compared to FTP/SFTP clients
• Minimalist interface lacks some conveniences of other SSH clients
• Lacks advanced SSH features like agent forwarding or port tunneling
• No official support offered

Blink Shell

Pros

• Access servers from mobile device
• Secure SSH connections
• Familiar command line interface
• Keyboard shortcuts for efficiency
• Customizable with themes
• Mosh improves remote shell experience

Cons

• Small screen for command line use
• Requires knowing Linux/Unix commands
• Not intuitive for non-technical users
• Keyboard use not as efficient as physical keyboard
• Limited functionality compared to full desktop SSH clients

Pricing Comparison

PuTTY

• Free
• Open Source

Blink Shell

• Free
• One-time Purchase