Pyppeteer vs WeasyPrint

Struggling to choose between Pyppeteer and WeasyPrint? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

Pyppeteer is a Development solution with tags like python, web-scraping, automation, headless-browser, chromium.

It boasts features such as Allows controlling headless Chrome/Chromium browser via Python, Provides high-level API for automating browser interactions, Supports webpage scraping, screenshot capturing, PDF generation, Implements asynchronous programming with async/await, Compatible with Jupyter notebooks and pros including Easy to use Pythonic API, Actively maintained and updated, Good documentation and community support, Headless browser operation minimizes footprint, Integrates well with existing Python workflows.

On the other hand, WeasyPrint is a Development product tagged with python, html, css, pdf, document-generation.

Its standout features include Converts HTML+CSS to PDF, Supports CSS 2.1, Supports SVG and MathML, Command-line interface and Python library, Generates PDFs with metadata, Supports UTF-8 encoding, Renders pages asynchronously, Produces pixel-perfect output, and it shines with pros like Open source and free, Simple and lightweight, Good support for web standards, Fast PDF generation, Many customization options, Works without browser or dependencies.

Feature	Pyppeteer	WeasyPrint
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

Pyppeteer

Description: Pyppeteer is a Python port of the Puppeteer JavaScript library created by Google. It provides high-level APIs to control headless Chrome or Chromium over the DevTools Protocol. Common use cases include web scraping, automated testing, and web automation.

WeasyPrint

Description: WeasyPrint is an open source Python library that can generate PDF documents from HTML and CSS files. It turns web pages into printable documents.

Key Features Comparison

Pyppeteer Features

• Allows controlling headless Chrome/Chromium browser via Python
• Provides high-level API for automating browser interactions
• Supports webpage scraping, screenshot capturing, PDF generation
• Implements asynchronous programming with async/await
• Compatible with Jupyter notebooks

WeasyPrint Features

• Converts HTML+CSS to PDF
• Supports CSS 2.1
• Supports SVG and MathML
• Command-line interface and Python library
• Generates PDFs with metadata
• Supports UTF-8 encoding
• Renders pages asynchronously
• Produces pixel-perfect output

Pros & Cons Analysis

Pyppeteer

Pros

• Easy to use Pythonic API
• Actively maintained and updated
• Good documentation and community support
• Headless browser operation minimizes footprint
• Integrates well with existing Python workflows

Cons

• Slower than pure JavaScript Puppeteer
• Some more advanced Puppeteer features not yet implemented
• Requires configuring Chrome/Chromium browser correctly
• Asynchronous programming model has learning curve

WeasyPrint

Pros

• Open source and free
• Simple and lightweight
• Good support for web standards
• Fast PDF generation
• Many customization options
• Works without browser or dependencies

Cons

• Limited CSS 3 support
• Lacks advanced PDF features
• Not suitable for complex documents
• Steep learning curve
• Limited documentation and support

Pricing Comparison

Pyppeteer

• Open Source

WeasyPrint

• Open Source