qmake vs Buildr

Struggling to choose between qmake and Buildr? Both products offer unique advantages, making it a tough decision.

qmake is a Development solution with tags like qt, make, build-automation, project-configuration.

It boasts features such as Cross-platform build automation, Simplified build system for Qt applications, Automatic generation of Makefiles, Supports various compilers and build environments, Includes pre-defined build rules for Qt modules, Allows for custom build configurations, Provides dependency management for Qt libraries and pros including Streamlines the build process for Qt projects, Reduces the complexity of managing build configurations, Ensures consistent build environments across platforms, Integrates well with the Qt framework, Extensive documentation and community support.

On the other hand, Buildr is a Development product tagged with ruby, java, c, scala, build, automation.

Its standout features include Ruby DSL for build configuration, Supports multiple languages like Java, Scala, Groovy, Clojure, C/C++, Built-in support for testing frameworks like JUnit, TestNG, Specs, Parallel builds, Built-in dependency management, IDE integration, Continuous integration support, and it shines with pros like Simple and expressive Ruby DSL, Cross-platform and cross-language support, Active open source community, Integrates well with other tools, Fast parallel builds.

Feature	qmake	Buildr
Overall Score	N/A	N/A
Primary Category	Development	Development

Product Overview

qmake

Description: qmake is a build automation and project configuration tool used primarily for projects using Qt. It automates the generation of Makefiles for building Qt applications. qmake helps simplify the build system for developers.

Buildr

Description: Buildr is an open-source software build system and project automation tool. It is written in Ruby and is designed for building Java, C/C++, Ruby, Scala and other language projects with ease. Buildr handles compilation, packaging, testing, and deployment.

Key Features Comparison

qmake Features

• Cross-platform build automation
• Simplified build system for Qt applications
• Automatic generation of Makefiles
• Supports various compilers and build environments
• Includes pre-defined build rules for Qt modules
• Allows for custom build configurations
• Provides dependency management for Qt libraries

Buildr Features

• Ruby DSL for build configuration
• Supports multiple languages like Java, Scala, Groovy, Clojure, C/C++
• Built-in support for testing frameworks like JUnit, TestNG, Specs
• Parallel builds
• Built-in dependency management
• IDE integration
• Continuous integration support

Pros & Cons Analysis

qmake

Pros

• Streamlines the build process for Qt projects
• Reduces the complexity of managing build configurations
• Ensures consistent build environments across platforms
• Integrates well with the Qt framework
• Extensive documentation and community support

Cons

• Limited functionality outside of the Qt ecosystem
• Steep learning curve for developers unfamiliar with Qt
• Potential performance issues for large-scale projects

Buildr

Pros

• Simple and expressive Ruby DSL
• Cross-platform and cross-language support
• Active open source community
• Integrates well with other tools
• Fast parallel builds

Cons

• Steep learning curve for Ruby DSL
• Limited adoption compared to Maven/Gradle
• Not as feature-rich as some alternatives

Pricing Comparison

qmake

• Open Source

Buildr

• Open Source